If you don’t want to be prosecuted for crimes, don’t do crimes.
– Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
responding to Republican fears of investigations by a future Democratic Congress
This week’s featured post is “Immigration is about Race“.
Ongoing stories
- Trump’s assault on American democracy. In Texas, people who engaged in some fairly normal protest mischief got sentenced to decades in prison because one guy shot at a cop.
- Climate change. The European heat wave has caused 1300 excess deaths so far.
- Iran War. It’s very hard to tell what’s going on. We have an agreement but we’re still talking. We have a ceasefire but we’re still shooting at each other.
- Ukraine. Russian oil refineries keep burning. Russia has a fuel shortage now, in spite of being one of the biggest oil producers in the world. Maybe this war-of-choice wasn’t such a good idea.
This week’s developments
This week everybody was talking about the Supreme Court

The Court made several important decisions this week, all 6-3 votes by the conservative majority. I discuss the two immigration-related ones in the featured post. The bloodstained gavel is a reference to sending refugees back to Haiti and Syria, which the State Department says is unsafe. A third Alito opinion the same day threw out Hawaii’s law requiring people to get permission from property owners to carry concealed weapons on their property.
The gun law had to be evaluated under that standards established in the the 2022 Bruen decision, the one requiring any gun restriction to be consistent with the history and traditions of gun laws in the US. No one really knows what that means, so in practice it turns into the Court’s conservative majority cherry-picking the historical examples that justify the conclusion it wants.
Today’s rulings just came out, so I haven’t looked at them. It appears to be a more mixed bag, with Trump winning some cases and losing others. To be honest, this worries me. Roberts likes to orchestrate the release of rulings in order to give himself cover. If he’s releasing some Trump losses today, I worry about what he has in store next.
The Texas Board of Education clearly understands that this Supreme Court will never enforce the separation of church and state against Christians. The Texas Tribune reports that an extensive list of Bible readings are now part of the K-12 curriculum. Meanwhile, the new standards cut back education about diversity and eliminate material that they think shines a negative light on US history.
They approved a lesson this week that requires students to learn about the Prophet Muhammad in the context of “brutal military campaigns against Jewish and Christian tribes, the normalization of slavery, and the taking of female captives as harem slaves.”
“Let me be very clear: Islam is not a religion,” state Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, testified before the education board Monday. “It is a totalitarian theocracy, not unlike totalitarian systems of communism, Nazism and globalism.”
Asked if he had ever visited a Muslim-majority country, the senator responded no.
If you live in Texas and are thinking about raising children, you might want to reconsider your choices.
and Democratic primaries in New York
The big news of Tuesday’s Democratic primaries was the defeat of incumbent congressmen Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat, by challengers from the left backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani backed five candidates in the primaries, and they all won. These results were widely trumpeted as advancing the Democratic Socialist wing of the Democratic Party.
Centrist Democrats (in the words of several headlines) “freaked out“. James Carville said on a podcast that he couldn’t be in the same party with some of the Mamdani candidates.
I’m done. I’m not in that fucking political party.
Conversely, Rep. Josh Gottheimer (NJ-5) wrote the Mamdani candidates out of his party.
Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.
I’m very disappointed in these reactions. I’m a blue-no-matter-who Democrat, and I’m going to stay that way as long as the Republican Party represents fascism. For the last decade, maybe even as far back as the 2000 presidential race (where Ralph Nader’s voters could have tipped the election to Al Gore), I have argued that progressive voters should line up behind moderate Democrats who win the primaries. If you can’t win the Democratic primary, I said, you can’t win the general election. The way to get the progressive candidates you want is to win in the primaries, not to sabotage the moderate Democrats who do.
Well, now progressives are winning primaries in New York and a few other places. This is the way the game is played. The way to change the party is to win primaries.
What’s disturbing in the Carville/Gottheimer response is the attitude of entitlement. The Democratic Party belongs to them, because it just does. Democratic voters have no say in the matter. Rebecca Solnit writes:
It’s weird the way the Democratic alleged leadership (Jeffries too) think that the party is a club with rules rather than something the voters choose. It’s….undemocratic.
It would be one thing if the Democratic Party had a clear philosophical definition, the way that the Republican Party of the 1850s was the anti-slavery party. But one common complaint about the Party in the current era is that it lacks definition. I don’t see any basis for saying that socialists can’t be Democrats.
The Party establishment has made several large mistakes in the last few years. Obama let the big bankers off the hook after the Great Recession of 2008. Biden uncritically kept feeding weapons into the Israeli war machine as it committed genocide in Gaza. Maybe a few others leap to your mind.
Even at its best, the Democratic establishment drifts into nostalgia about the Obama years, as if America would be fine if we could just undo what Trump has done to the country. But Trump rose to power because a lot of Americans already felt left behind. I agree that I’d rather have Obama back than stick with Trump, but it’s not like that was some kind of golden age.
There has to be a reckoning. Leaders who backed those mistakes need to make their case to the voters and face judgment. They aren’t entitled to keep their jobs just because.
and Tulsi Gabbard

Last Sunday, WaPo published an expose about Tulsi Gabbard. In particular, it focused on the Hare Krishna group she was raised in and the influence its leader, Chris Butler, may have had on her while she was in Congress and possibly while she was Director of National Intelligence.
I’ve never been much of a fan of Tulsi Gabbard, either when she was progressive Democrat or a MAGA Republican. But I’m not inclined to pile on to this story, for a number of reasons: First, the accusations in the story are not that extreme; it always seems to be building up to something it never delivers. For many years, some anonymous emailer who seems to be Butler gave Gabbard detailed political advice, including what positions to take and how to defend them. She seems to have taken much of that advice. But WaPo has no evidence, for example, that Gabbard ever discussed classified information with Butler, or that she otherwise abused the power of her various offices for his benefit. Gabbard just had a religious leader whose guidance she took very seriously.
And that brings me to the second reason I’m playing this down: In political stories concerning religion, strangeness often gets misinterpreted as danger. When Barack Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright became in issue in the 2008 campaign, clips of Wright’s sermons went viral. To people whose image of church came from mainline White denominations, Wright’s speaking style seemed scary, even though it was perfectly normal in Black churches.
Hare Krishna is strange to many Americans, so the Gabbard/Butler connection seems suspicious in a way that a similarly close connection between Marco Rubio and a Catholic priest would not.
Maybe there is a newsworthy scandal somewhere in the decades-long conversations Gabbard had with Butler. But I haven’t seen it yet.
and you also might be interested in …
To nobody’s surprise, the Bureau of Economic Analysis said inflation was up in May, to 4.1% year-over-year. Even excluding food and energy (i.e., the more volatile parts of the index), it was up 3.4%. The only time since the 1980s that it was higher were 2021 and 2022, when Covid interrupted supply chains.

It’s sad that Trump has made America’s 250th birthday center on himself rather than the country. He undercut the bipartisan America 250 planning committee by creating his own Freedom 250. He opened Freedom 250 with a UFC cage match on his own birthday, then kicked off his Great American State Fair by giving a political speech.
The State Fair itself has become a sad affair, with mostly red states represented and no crowds worth mentioning. The concert fell apart as artists realized they were contributing to Trump’s greater glory.
The Duckpin blog describes how the GASF devolved from something that sounded kind of fun to its current manifestation. Originally it was going to be on the Iowa State Fairgrounds. Then it was going to move from state to state, eventually reaching the National Mall like a musical arriving on Broadway. Then just the National Mall part of the idea survived.
When Trump did kick it off Wednesday night, only about 1000 people showed up, and many of them left while Trump was still speaking. So he lied about it and claimed 45000 people instead.
It didn’t have to be this way. A president with less ego, like Gerald Ford in 1976 or an alternate-timeline President Harris today, could have stayed out of the way and let the country celebrate itself. There might be a real festival happening, with a concert lineup similar to what President Obama arranged to open his presidential center in Chicago on Juneteenth.
Instead, we’re looking at each other and wondering how long the country can go on this way. How much past 250 will “freedom” survive, if it’s still surviving now?
Pete Buttigieg had to endure being separated from his children for 24 hours because someone called in a false complaint to child protective services.
and let’s close with something
One of the more whimsical YouTube channels is the musical “There I Ruined It“, which promises to “lovingly destroy your favorite songs”. In this selection, a new country-and-western song is constructed out of 50 country songs that all mention “cold beer”.
Comments
Doug, I’m disappointed that you’ve jumped on the “Israel committed genocide” bandwagon. Yes, the Gaza war was terrible, with many innocent deaths, but it wasn’t a “genocide” based on the word’s actual definition. Applying “genocide” to this conflict has turned the word into little more than an identity marker – if you call it a “genocide,” you demonstrate that you hold the currently approved antizionist bona-fides. Same with other buzzwords like “ethnic cleansing,” “ethnostate,” and “settler colonialism,” none of which apply to the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Now that “genocide” merely means “a war I happen to disapprove of,” we’re going to need a new word to cover actual genocide.
The Israeli government has been ensuring starvation for the people of Gaza. I consider that genocide and I believe it conforms to the meaning of the word. It is not anti-Zionist to state the truth of the matter.
I have to agree the mass killing, starvation, and denial of medical supplies to one people seems to fit the definition of genocide. It is also a war crime to deny food and medical to people in areas of your control. The way that Israel conducts wars is criminal behavior, look how many Lebanese civilians have been killed versus actual members of Hezbollah killed.
That is not happening now, there is plenty of food in Gaza. What you’re referring to is the period during the active fighting when UN reports indicated that there was 6 months of food in Gaza, and the Israelis mistakenly relied on that. Once it became clear that there was food insecurity, Israel immediately allowed food to go in, much of which Hamas appropriated.
It’s an unusual genocide that the victims could have ended anytime, simply by surrendering and returning the hostages they were holding. I can’t think of a single genocide in history when that was the case. Also, the definition of genocide includes other factors besides just starvation, even if that was actually happening.
It’s not antizionist to describe what’s going on, but it is antisemitic to hold Israel to a unique standard based mostly on lies.
When you are reduced to arguing about whether Israel’s behavior meets a particular dictionary definition, you have already lost the moral argument.
More like correcting mistakes. If I excused the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol as a reaction to the genocide of conservative white Christian men, wouldn’t you feel obligated to correct me? Or you wouldn’t say anything because you would “lose the moral argument?”
Netanyahu vowed to treat the Palestinians in Gaza the same way king Saul treated the Amalekites. It’s a genocide.
The original Hamas Charter called for the death of every Jewish person in the world. So according to your standard, it’s a genocide on both sides.
Hey Doug, it’s been a while but I thought I’d check back in to see how liberals are handling the fact that their empire is dying in the strait of Hormuz. You still don’t seem to understand how you got here, since you wrote:
“The Party establishment has made several large mistakes in the last few years. Obama let the big bankers off the hook after the Great Recession of 2008. Biden uncritically kept feeding weapons into the Israeli war machine as it committed genocide in Gaza. Maybe a few others leap to your mind.”
How can you write that and not question everything you’ve believed about the Democratic Party? Committing a genocide is not a “mistake,” it is the crime of crimes under international law. It makes Biden and his underlings genocidaires, the Democratic Party a party of genocidal racial supremacists like Likud, and makes America a genocidal state just like Israel
How can “fighting fascism” mean anything when the supposed liberal opposition is this monstrous? You can’t solve that with a few primary victories. The bare minimum needed to return the Democratic Party to a party of even the most mild liberal universalism is for Biden and his top officials to be punished for their crimes so that future politicians too scared to even consider doing something like this again.
You also need to reconsider everything you believed about America and its place in the world. The fact that the Gaza genocide is bipartisan should make it clear that the rot in the country runs far deeper than Trump and the Republicans. The bare minimum you should do is what the Russian liberals did after Russia invaded Ukraine and be calling for America to be sanctioned into oblivion for its crimes. Frankly, you should have been doing that after America attacked Iran as well.
Unless Israel’s war in Gaza isn’t actually a “genocide,” and our alliance with Israel is for strategic reasons, and not out of a bloodthirsty desire to enable the IDF to kill Palestinian babies for fun.
It’s hilarious that you want to punish Biden but don’t mention Trump at all. Don’t worry, Tucker Carlson is forming his own party which will be based on non-intervention and hatred of Israel, sounds like it should be right up your alley.
I fully expect the next Democratic administration (if there is one with people like you refusing to vote for Democrats) to reduce or end military aid to Israel. Netanyahu has already said Israel needs to stop accepting US aid. So it’s probably inevitable. And once that happens, you can ignore Israel and focus on actual genocides the US is facilitating, assuming you care to find out about them when they don’t come up on your TikTok feed.
Speaking of textualism; is the definition of genocide to be determined by someone’s dictionary, or by the definition given in international law.
How about the definition by Rafael Lemkin, who came up with the term?
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Notice this doesn’t include “expressing negative sentiments or talking about killing members of the group,” which seems to be what most people base it on. Ben-Gvir said something, so therefore the war is a genocide.
That being said, I’ll wait until the ICJ issues its formal determination in 2029. I’m not going to go by the opinion of random people on the internet who are using the word as an identity marker, or biased groups like Amnesty International, or jokes like the International Association of Genocide Scholars that anyone can join for a $35 membership fee.
Texas is wrong about Islam, in the beginning the 3 religions got along and Islam was more progressive in many ways including education, math, and science. That certainly changed when teachers in Egypt challenged some religious beliefs. What really changed things was the crusades. That might be a reason why the radicals dislike Christians. They also dislike the US because of our constant meddling in the Middle East countries.
I’m not sure what you mean by “getting along.” “In the beginning” Muslim armies swept across the Arab world and North Africa, forcibly converting Jewish and Christian communities. But that should have no bearing on how Muslims are treated in the US today since none of them have any responsibility for how their co-religionists behaved 1400 years ago. Discrimination against Muslims based on events in antiquity is unacceptable, but that’s not a reason to whitewash Muslim history which is just as bloody as Christian history.
Trackbacks
[…] Just Say No […]
[…] Doug Mouder at The Weekly Sift: “Just Say No“ […]