Mike Pence. I’ve heard that name before.

He hasn’t come up often, but the examples are illuminating.


Friday, a few days before the Republican Convention that begins today in Cleveland, Donald Trump announced his vice presidential choice: Governor Mike Pence of Indiana.

This is a liberal blog and I make no secret about rooting for Democrats. After all, my commitment to my readers is to be honest, not unbiased. (I’m skeptical of people who believe they can be totally objective.) Being honest, I confess to this perceptual bias: Whenever the Republicans nominate someone, all his previous actions seem to take on a sinister aspect, and I find myself suddenly realizing that he is the worst human being since Hitler. (“How did I miss that until now?” I wonder.)

So to discipline my thinking, I thought I’d look back and see where Pence has come up in the The Weekly Sift in the past, before I knew he’d be a national candidate. Two kinds of Republicans make frequent appearances in the Sift: decision-making leaders like Paul Ryan and fringe voices like Sarah Palin or Louie Gohmert, who are constantly saying things too crazy to ignore. (Ted Cruz is a bit of a hybrid: a leader of the crazy faction.) So where and when has Pence shown up?

I found two mentions of him by name and a third story I somehow left his name out of, even though he was right in the middle of it. That verified my initial impression that he has been around a while and done a few things, but so far has had little historical significance.

The first mention is just two sentences and falls into the crazy category: In March, 2009, when the economy was still plunging and even conservative economists were talking about a stimulus of some kind, Pence was urging Congress to push demand down further:

Indiana Republican Congressman Mike Pence knows just what to do in these times when nobody but the government is spending: “Freeze federal spending immediately!” I’m speechless.

The second is harder to pigeonhole: During the 2012 campaign, I was reviewing the bait-and-switch by which the Tea Party had focused on the deficit during the 2010 campaign, but then immediately pivoted to a right-wing social agenda once they took office. This 2011 Pence quote demonstrated that pivot:

Our economy is struggling and our national government is awash in a sea of debt. Amidst these struggles, some would have us focus our energies on jobs and spending. … I agree. Let’s start by denying all federal funding for abortion at home and abroad. The largest abortion provider in America should not also be the largest recipient of federal funding under Title X. The time has come to deny any and all federal funding to Planned Parenthood of America.

And my comment was:

Annual Planned Parenthood funding under Title X was about $70 million. Take that, trillion-dollar deficit!

In March, 2015 I didn’t name Governor Pence, but he was right in the middle of Indiana’s Christians-have-a-right-to-discriminate-against-gays law, summed up by this cartoon.

The law is basically identical to the one that Governor Jan Brewer — never known as a defender of gay rights — had just vetoed in Arizona, but Pence signed Indiana’s version. That left me facing the emptiness of my own threats:

How the heck am I going to boycott Indiana, when I was never planning to go there anyway?

(Ultimately, Indiana’s business community pushed the legislature to pass a second law, which mitigated some of the damage. Pence signed it.)

The GOP’s anti-science tendencies often come up in the Sift, but Pence has never been the national face of those issues, so I haven’t written about him in that context. However, I can’t conclude this article without mentioning a number of anti-science positions he has taken:

  • He won’t say whether he personally believes that evolution happened, but he wants public schools to teach the evolution/creation pseudo-controversy (“teach all of the facts about all of these controversial areas, and let our students, let our children and our children’s children, decide”), a back-door position through which tax dollars can be spent promoting scientifically baseless religious theories in science classes. This practice not only encourages the relativistic view that you can believe whatever you want about science, but also wastes classroom time that could be spent teaching actual facts.
  • Pence wrote: “Despite the hysteria from the political class and the media, smoking doesn’t kill.”
  • Pence wrote: “Global warming is a myth … the Earth is actually cooler today than it was about 50 years ago.” (This was not as obviously false when he wrote it in 1998 as it is today, but it was still false. At the time, you could cherry-pick your data (see the second graph in this link), compare an unusually cool 1995 against an unusually warm 1945, and claim they were about the same. But even then you had to know you were playing deceptive games with numbers.) In 2009 he claimed: “In the mainstream media, there is a denial of the growing skepticism in the scientific community on global warming.” (That “scientific” skepticism comes almost entirely from the fossil fuel industry. In the actual scientific community, the consensus is solid and growing in certainty.)

All in all, I have a hard time arguing with Steve Benen’s assessment (which he bases on the DW-nominate system of quantifying congressional voting records on a left/right scale) that Pence is “the most far-right running mate in modern history”.

Let’s put this another way: during his congressional career, Pence wasn’t just more conservative than Paul Ryan. His voting record also put him to the right of Michele Bachmann, Todd Akin, Steve King, and even Louie Gohmert.

So I’m going to restrain myself from speculating about where Pence ranks on the Hitler Scale of human beings. But if we’re looking at the Jan Brewer Scale of right-wing extremist governors, or the Bachmann/Gohmert Scale of crazy congresspeople, he might take it to 11.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Bill Camarda  On July 18, 2016 at 9:50 am

    Pence’s comment in 2009 expresses a fear that I’ve had for quite awhile. Every decade or so, there’s a massive economic crisis, and we’re due for one. Next time it happens, we’ll have already used all the economic tools available to us to escape (e.g., reducing interest rates – they’re already practically zero). And the only possibly-effective actions left to us (bailouts, massive deficit spending) will be so unpopular that we’ll do precisely the opposite. Republicans in Congress and/or the White House will make sure of it.

  • junctionshamus  On July 18, 2016 at 10:35 am

    “And my comment was: Annual Planned Parenthood funding under Title X was about $70 million. Take that, trillion-dollar deficit!”

    So what had your knickers in a twist, the $70M, or the $1T. Mine would have been the latter, as I’m not a trough-slopping, teat-sucker.

    • Bill Camarda  On July 18, 2016 at 11:01 am

      So I assume you’ve carefully compared what happened to the annual federal budget deficit under Reagan/Bush41 vs. Bill Clinton; and again under Bush43 vs. Obama.

      I assume you’ve compared how Bush43 paid for his prescription drug benefit (not!) with how Obama paid for Obamacare.

      I assume you recall Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) discussing how when Republicans ran the country “it was standard practice not to pay for things…” http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/01/22/78715/hatch-pay-health-bill/

      Finally, I assume you’ve run the numbers on the deficit impact of current Republican tax plans.

      There’s no way to care about the deficit and also vote Republican.

  • mfennvt  On July 18, 2016 at 10:58 am

    And don’t forget the anti-choice stuff he’s signed in Indiana. Purvi Patel is serving a 20-year sentence because her miscarriage was considered an abortion, thanks to the feticide laws there.

  • Leon  On July 18, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    For those liberal Hoosiers like myself, Pence has long distinguished himself as one of the worst members of our congressional delegation. At least he’s not going to be governor again, thanks to Indiana Election law.

  • Abby Hafer  On July 18, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    “…a back-door position through which tax dollars can be spent promoting scientifically baseless religious theories in science classes.” One teensy request: Don’t call them theories. Call them ideas. Or stories. They are not theories, because there isn’t any material evidence for them.

Trackbacks

  • By The Call Remains | The Weekly Sift on July 18, 2016 at 1:41 pm

    […] This week’s featured posts are “A Real Pro-Police Agenda is Liberal” and “Mike Pence. I’ve heard that name before.” […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: