Why the rancher’s racist rant shouldn’t have surprised anybody
If you’ve been paying attention to the Cliven Bundy situation at all (as I started doing last week) you no doubt heard that Wednesday night he went off script in front of a New York Times reporter:
“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.
“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
Reactions varied. Bundy’s own first reaction was to claim he had been misquoted — “I didn’t say nothing about picking cotton” — until Media Matters released the video of him saying it.
Mainstream Republicans who had made a hero of Bundy — Rand Paul and Sean Hannity in particular — claimed to be shocked, and dropped the rancher like a hot rock. But the true believers promoted a smeared-by-the-liberal-media theme. InfoWars posted a longer version of the video that it claims vindicates Bundy: “his argument is actually anti-racist in that it laments the plight of black families who have been caught in the trap of dependency on government.” (I invite you to click through and examine the larger context for yourself. I don’t think it vindicates much of anything, probably because I already see the “dependency on government” meme as a racist dog whistle. I mean, we all know who those dependent-on-government people are, don’t we? We’re not talking about my white mother depending on Medicare to pay her hospital bills.)
One of the best responses came from satirist Andy Borowitz, whose invented quotes nail the hidden meaning of the mainstream Republican reaction:
“We Republicans have worked long and hard to develop insidious racial code words like ‘entitlement society’ and ‘personal responsibility,’ ” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky). “There is no excuse for offensive racist comments like the ones Cliven Bundy made when there are so many subtler ways of making the exact same point.”
Fox News also blasted the rancher, saying in a statement, “Cliven Bundy’s outrageous racist remarks undermine decades of progress in our effort to come up with cleverer ways of saying the same thing.”
If you hear someone saying that Bundy just wasn’t “politically correct” — or that the problem is “an old man rancher isn’t media trained to express himself perfectly” —
that’s what they really mean: It’s fine to imply that slavery wasn’t so bad and to characterize black people receiving government assistance (i.e., all of them) as lazy and promiscuous and criminal, but you have to use the right words, like Paul Ryan did in March:
We have got this tailspin of culture, in our inner cities in particular, of men not working and just generations of men not even thinking about working or learning the value and the culture of work. There is a real culture problem here that has to be dealt with.
Ryan presumably does have some media training, so he didn’t say Negro or mention slavery or picking cotton — and it’s those words (and not the ideas behind them) that make Bundy’s quote racist, right? Ryan criticized the “culture” of the “inner city” rather than black people, so his comment couldn’t be racist — “I don’t have a racist bone in my body” he said afterward — even though everybody knew who he was talking about and what he meant.
By contrast to the apparent shock of Sean Hannity, liberals mainly expressed surprise that anybody would be surprised by the discovery that Bundy is a racist. Matt Yglesias found it “clarifying” that Bundy had gone off on race “because race has not been far from my mind since the story first hit the papers.”
On Bill Mahr’s Real Time, Daily Beast editor John Avlon explained:
The reason it’s predictable is that we’ve seen a pattern, especially at a time when the face of the federal government is an African-American. The association with racists is becoming the black lung disease of the conservative movement. It’s an occupational hazard. … You start seeing a pattern and at some point you’ve got to confront it: “How come we keep making common cause with racists?” Maybe it’s got something to do with some of the appeals they’re making.
Rachel Maddow did the best job of laying that pattern out: Much of what Bundy had been saying all along were the kinds of bizarre ideas that are not themselves racist, but are way more popular in white supremacist circles than anywhere else. (It’s like an accent; you don’t have to be Canadian to end a question with “eh”, but if you do you probably are.) Rachel drilled down into the history of one particular strange notion: that county sheriffs are the ultimate in legitimate legal authority. Bundy had been urging his own county sheriff to disarm the federal agents, as if the sheriff’s authority were paramount. (In 2012, a fringe candidate for sheriff in my own Hillsborough County, NH professed a similar view of the job he imagined himself to be running for. He lost.) Rachel chased that notion back through the 20th-century Posse Comitatus movement, and from there back to the Southern resistance to Reconstruction in the 19th century.
Something I’m just beginning to appreciate is how influential the Southern anti-Reconstruction movement that birthed the KKK has been in forming the ideas that are still running around on the extreme Right. If you want initiate yourself into this mindset, I recommend reading Thomas Dixon’s 1905 best-seller The Clansman: a Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan, which inspired the 1915 movie classic The Birth of a Nation, and whose themes were still echoing in 1936’s Gone With the Wind. Dixon drops you into a world where the Klan are the good guys. Evil Washington politicians have conspired with corrupt and rapacious local blacks to upend the natural order and create a black-dominated society. Unable to take any more, the noble Southern whites arm and organize themselves into a freedom-seeking secret society, the KKK. Once they do, the fundamentally cowardly black troops that Washington has tried to stand up against them scatter like nine-pins.
This “historical romance” has essentially nothing to do with the actual history of the KKK, which from the beginning was focused on terrorizing blacks out of claiming their rights.
But there’s a configuration of ideas we might call the Klan Komplex — a combination of Lost Cause mythology, John Calhoun’s* misinterpretation of the Constitution and miscasting of the Founders, love of guns, and hatred of the federal government — that survives to this day in radical right-wing fringe groups. Today many of these ideas sound like nonsense to outsiders, but the whole Komplex makes sense if you picture yourself as a defeated Southern aristocrat watching victorious Union troops side with your former slaves against you, and looking to the heroic knights of the KKK to restore you to your rightful dominance.
- The federal government is illegitimate, having grossly exceeded the authority legitimately granted by the Constitution. Government officials have no claim to represent the American people.
- The Founders were divinely inspired men whose vision has been betrayed.
- The true federal government was an agreement among the states, and had no direct authority over the American people.
- The Founders intended states’ rights to be paramount and the federal government to be weak.
- Slavery in the old South was a benevolent institution. Through slavery, African savages were civilized and taught Christianity. They were treated well by their masters.
- Slavery is the worst thing that can happen to a white man. Any time the federal government forces a white man to do something he doesn’t want to do, he is being enslaved.
- Federal taxes are confiscation.
- The federal government has corrupted blacks by removing them from the benevolent authority of whites and giving them goods that it has confiscated from whites. Blacks are addicted to these government handouts, and through that addiction the government dominates them more completely than their masters ever did.
- The United States was founded to be a white Christian nation. Non-whites and non-Christians have been generously allowed to settle and prosper here, but now they are illegitimately taking over.
- States can nullify federal laws.
- States have the right to secede, and the South was right to do so.
- The Second Amendment was put into the Bill of Rights so that citizens could overthrow the federal government if it exceeded its authority.
- The vast armament of private citizens is the only thing that keeps the federal government from establishing tyranny. Armed citizens ready to revolt against the federal government are the true American patriots.
Those ideas are not related to each other in any logical sense, so it would certainly be possible to believe a few of them without the others. But they originated together in the defeated South and have spread through the same channels ever since. As a result, although lots of people believe one or two of these ideas, if you hear more than a few of them from someone, probably you’ll eventually hear all the rest. When well-armed white men are rabidly opposed to the federal government and talk at length about their love of their own freedom, chances are excellent that they will eventually start waxing nostalgic about slavery, as Cliven Bundy did.
That shouldn’t surprise anyone.
* I keep meaning to write a longer article on the seminal influence of Calhoun on the Right. (Sam Tanenhaus has already done one, but I have a different take.) Whenever right-wingers talk about “the Founders” or “the Constitution” in ways that make no historical sense, they are probably invoking John Calhoun without realizing it. Calhoun re-interpreted (i.e., misinterpreted) the Founders in a way that allowed Jefferson Davis and the other Confederate secessionists to claim that they were the true heirs of the Revolution. In particular, Calhoun cast the Constitution as a confederation agreement among the states (similar to the Articles of Confederation it replaced), ignoring that it begins “We the People” rather than “We the States”.
Combining freedom-loving rhetoric with a positive attitude towards slavery goes back to Calhoun’s 1837 Senate speech “Slavery a Positive Good“. Slave-holding founders like Washington and Jefferson had been ambivalent about slavery, regarding it as an evil but not willing to support any of the schemes to end it. (Jefferson described slavery as holding “a wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go.” Lincoln’s campaign platform that slavery should not be extended the territories — the cause of the South’s secession — was originally Jefferson’s idea.) But by the 1830s, abolitionism had progressed to such a point that Calhoun foresaw the slave system’s destruction unless the South full-throatedly defended it as good. Already in the first paragraph, though, he uses slavery as a vision of horror, if it should happen to white people.
[E]ncroachments must be met at the beginning, and those who act on the opposite principle are prepared to become slaves.
So Calhoun urges Southern whites to stand up to the abolitionists, lest they metaphorically become slaves of the North. But he holds literal slavery to be a good thing, when it happens to an inferior race like the Africans. That fundamental hypocrisy has been with us ever since.
Comments
“We have got this tailspin of culture, in our inner cities in particular, of men not working and just generations of men not even thinking about working or learning the value and the culture of work. There is a real culture problem here that has to be dealt with.”
The real culture problem here is the New Jim Crow – the prison industry and the drug war disenfranchising generations.
T. Thorn Coyle, yes, yes and yes.
Another concept worth pointing out is that in Ireland where “race” is not part of the equation – where the issue is largely socio- economic, the debate over dependency on entitlements is just as vociferous.
Paul Ryan’s words are echoed everywhere where there is the legitimate concern that entitlements have become a trap rather than a source of support when needed.
Glossing over this issue by screaming racist every time it emerges in the US is just silly partisanship that is ultimately the opposite of progressive.
That said, for Bundy to suggest that people were better off enslaved is also just ridiculous and deserves the treatment it gets.
Another reason to suspect the Democratic partisan line on those “racist” republicans is just a quick look at reality, data.
First, there has been an exodus of African Americans from Blue states to Red states according to democratic trends….
http://blackdemographics.com/geography/african-american-migration/
Why because, Red states are less segregated, more integrated, and provide a better chance of social mobility into the middle class at least if house ownership is any indication of the social mobility.
http://blackdemographics.com/geography/segregation/
http://blackdemographics.com/households/housing/
And finally if the democratic party is so progressive why are Blue States the most regressive in the nation in terms of income inequality.
Tough questions for democrats. It’s easy to shout racist, it’s harder to create the right environment for people to actually thrive.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/04/the-polarized-partisan-geography-of-inequality/360130/
The point here isn’t that Democrats are calling Republicans racists, it’s that racists are looking at the Republican Party and saying, “That’s where I belong.”
But that actually is the point isn’t it? That’s what the cartoon is implying. The problem isn’t that racists are looking at the Republican Party and saying “that’s where I belong” they’re looking at it and saying “I’ve got nowhere else to go”.
Nuanced, but different. It actually destroys a liberal tenant that racism is alive and well because they’re going to a mainstream party as they have no mainstream choice of their own.
But why do they go to the Republican party, is it that the Republicans are more “racist” than the Dems? Yes….depending on what you mean by racist. And here is where the argument actually is between the left and the right and it involved unfettered access to govt benefits and govt help versus some limitations placed on that access. If you’re for some limitations, you’re a Repub…and a racist. If you’re for no limitations, you’re a Dem and not a racist.
If you’re ACTUALLY a racist, which party are you going for? The one that places some limitations or the one that places none?
That’s why they flock to the Repub party, because when you have no options, the one closest to your ideology is where you go.
Does that mean the Repubs are actually racist? Not at all, but apparently any time you ask “why” and you’re a white male in this country, you’re immediately colored a racist. And THAT is actually the more devastating prejudice in this country
I’m wondering where you have heard Democrats advocate “unfettered access to government benefits” with “no limitations”.
are you seriously contending that people “thrive” in what’s known as “Red” states?
The book “American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America” by Woodward makes it clear that many of the ideas expressed by the far right are from the nation called “Greater Appalachia”. The KKK was founded in that nation and many of the values expressed by the far right are consistent with those Scots and Irish Borderlanders who immigrated to American so long ago.
So, when you stereotype white people who hold anti-govt ideas as “racists” it’s ok because “you’ve seen a pattern before”.
But when someone stereotypes black people it’s not ok, even though “they’ve seen a pattern [of behavior] before”?
Interesting….
The nuances are the same in both cases. I spelled them out here: https://weeklysift.com/2012/04/02/prejudice-bigotry-and-reasonable-racism/
If this appears twice, please let me know. For the Ron Paul devotees: Tea Party White Supremacism:
April 1, 2014: “Candidate For Texas Governor [Greg Abbott] Invokes [White Supremacist] Who Believes Women And Minorities Are Inferior”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/01/greg-abbott-charles-murray_n_5071689.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics
Jan. 21, 2014: “PA Republican has an exciting new plan to legalize discrimination” [based on race, gender, religion…]
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/213514/pa-republican-has-an-exciting-new-plan-to-legalize-discrimination/
March 17, 2014: “South Dakota Lawmaker Says Businesses Should Be Able To Turn Away African-Americans”
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/03/17/3413901/south-dakota-lawmaker-says-businesses-should-be-able-to-turn-away-african-americans/
“Old Photos Surface Showing Breitbart, O’Keefe Hobnobbing with White Nationalists”
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/02/14/old-photos-surface-showing-breitbart-okeefe-hobnobbing-with-white-nationalists/#.UwJgZCQDoAE.twitter
“Steve King and White Nationalist CPAC Panel Warn that America’s Greatest Threat is its Diversity” (Peter Brimelow/VDARE)
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/steve-king-and-white-nationalist-cpac-panel-warn-americas-greatest-threat-its-diversity
“SCANDAL! Rand Paul MUST return Neo-Nazi funds NOW and DENOUNCE Stormfront.org”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/05/24/869320/-SCANDAL-Rand-Paul-MUST-return-Neo-Nazi-funds-NOW-and-DENOUNCE-Stormfront-org#
Al Jazeera Report: “People & Power – White Power USA” (Documentary)
“White Nationalists Descend on D.C. for National Policy Institute Conference” (Richard Spencer and Peter Brimelow/VDARE) http://www.irehr.org/issue-areas/race-racism-and-white-nationalism/item/517-npi-conference-2013
Also covered here: http://www.salon.com/2013/09/29/the_hatemonger_next_door/
SPLC: “Former Congressman Tancredo to Address White Supremacists”
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/06/19/former-congressman-tancredo-to-address-white-supremacists/
IREHR Special Report: “The Status of the Tea Party Movement – Part One: The Tea Party in 2013”
“This, the 40th annual [CPAC] conference began with a well-choreographed effort to present a softer, more diverse, conservative movement. Beyond the main hall, however, the façade melted away. In the many conference rooms that the Tea Party dominated, events featured blatant racism, homophobia, sexism, Islamophobia and the militia impulse.”
http://www.irehr.org/issue-areas/tea-party-nationalism/tea-party-news-and-analysis/item/525-status-of-tea-party-part-one
IREHR Report: “Tea Parties – Racism, Anti-Semitism and the Militia Impulse”
http://www.irehr.org/issue-areas/tea-party-nationalism/the-report/tea-parties-racism-anti-semitism-and-the-militia-impulse
“White Supremacist Stampede”
Jul 4, 2011 8:18 PM EDT
“A startling number of white-power candidates are seeking public office. Eve Conant reports on their under-the-radar strategy and David Duke’s White House flirtation.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/04/white-supremacists-running-for-political-office-in-2012-in-growing-numbers.html
“GOP Senate Candidate Addressed Conference Hosted by Neo-Confederate Group That Promotes Secessionism”
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/10/gop-senate-candidate-spoke-neo-confederate-conference-august
“Steve Smith, White Supremacist, Elected To Republican Party Committee In Pennsylvania County”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/01/white-nationalist-elected-to-gop_n_1563020.html
Al Jazeera Report: “People & Power – White Power USA” (Documentary)
“Neo-Confederate Behind Pro-Huckabee Flag Ads in South Carolina”
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/neo-confederate-behind-pro-huckabee-flag-ads-south-carolina
Video: Ron Paul Gives Speech on Civil War in Front of Giant Confederate Flag:
One of the remaining Republican Presidential candidates spouts Civil War revisionism, standing in front of a Dixie flag”
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/39801_video-_ron_paul_gives_speech_on_civil_war_in_front_of_giant_confederate_flag
“Ron Paul Curriculum Launched by Reconstructionist Gary North and Neo-Confederate Thomas Woods”
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2013/4/9/124434/9216
“The Ron Paul Institute: Be Afraid, Very Afraid”
by James Kirchick Apr 25, 2013 4:45 AM EDT
“The former presidential contender is back, this time as head of a new ‘institute’ for ‘peace’ comprised of anti-Semites, 9/11 truthers, and dictator lovers [and racists]: James Kirchick reports.“
http://www.nationalmemo.com/ron-paul-to-keynote-anti-semitic-conference/
„Ron Paul to Keynote Catholic Traditionalist Summit with NeoFascist and Overtly Anti-Semitic Speakers” (and racists)
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2013/8/23/144536/636
“Meet the ‘Southern Avenger’! Another Member of Rand Paul’s Team Has White Supremacist Past”
http://www.alternet.org/3-most-disgusting-deceptions-junk-food-industry-using-you
Also: http://freebeacon.com/rebel-yell/
“The Convergence of Glenn Greenwald and Rand Paul’s ‘Southern Avenger.” (Liberty Tour VIDEO):
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/42436_The_Convergence_of_Glenn_Greenwald_and_Rand_Pauls_Southern_Avenger
April 2014: [NEWS VIDEO] “After less than two weeks on the job, the Marionville, Missouri mayor who said he “kind of agrees” with some of Frazier Glenn Cross’ anti-Semitic views, has announced his intention to resign. Cross is accused of murdering three people at the Jewish Community Center in Overland Park, Kansas on April 13, 2014.”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/22/1293725/-After-citizen-complains-Missouri-mayor-resigns?detail=email
Marionville Mayor : “The futures market, the Federal Reserve, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health — every time I see that on the news, there are Jewish names and they run things.”
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/22/mayor-resigns-anti-semitic-remarks/7996807/
Cliven Bundy’s white supremacist hoedown: “Here’s video of the racist thing Cliven Bundy denied he ever said” (“The Negro” “better off picking cotton”):
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/24/cliven_bundy_claims_he_never_said_black_people_were_better_off_picking_cotton_heres_video_that_proves_hes_lying/
Rachel Maddow breaks down Cliven Bundy’s Christian Identity white supremacist movement:
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/radical-racist-context-missed-in-rancher-hype-236481603620
April 2014: “EXPOSED: The Source Of Cliven Bundy’s Crackpot Constitutionalism”
As Promoted by Glenn Beck on Fox “News” “After searching for the distinctive cover of the document in Bundy’s pocket, the publisher turned out to be the innocuously named National Center for Constitutional Studies (NCCS). However, the NCCS is not the commendable educational organization it purports to be. It began life as the Freemen Institute, a vehicle for the far-right, Mormon, anti-commie, history revisionist, W. Cleon Skousen. Skousen taught that the Constitution was inspired by a God who intended America to be a Christian nation. He also professed the canon of white supremicism that Anglo-Saxons are descended from a lost tribe of Israel. The Southern Poverty Law Center chronicled the NCCS curriculum based on Skousen’s philosophy saying that he…
“…demonized the federal regulatory agencies, arguing for the abolition of everything from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to the Environmental Protection Agency. He wanted to repeal the minimum wage, smash unions, nullify anti-discrimination laws, sell off public lands and national parks, end the direct election of senators, kill the income tax and the estate tax, knock down state-level walls separating church and state, and, of course, raze the Federal Reserve System.”
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=12655
April 25, 2014: [Koch] “The Money Behind Fox’s Promotion Of Cliven Bundy’s Battle With The Feds”
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/25/the-money-behind-foxs-promotion-of-cliven-bundy/199034
I just wish someone would use this occasion to educate our people, who are apparently appallingly stupid about the most obvious things. Blacks couldn’t just be with their families and their chickens under slavery because they were THINGS, subject to sale at any time. One child or a husband or a wife could very easily be sold off at any moment by their owners. Are we forgetting what slavery meant?
Great writing!
you know who talks about Calhounism is Nancy McClain in Democracy in Chains. check that out.
Trackbacks
[…] week’s featured articles are “More Than Just Affirmative Action” and “Cliven Bundy and the Klan Komplex“. Both topics sent me back to study the 19th […]
[…] that research have shown up in posts like “Slavery Lasted Until Pearl Harbor“, “Cliven Bundy and the Klan Komplex“, and my review of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ article on reparations.) Along the way, I came to […]
[…] apparent outcome of the Civil War. That article became necessary because previous articles “Cliven Bundy and the Klan Komplex” and “Rights Are For People Like Us” were too speculative and needed more […]
[…] Party,” and it lead to his “Slavery Lasted Until Pearl Harbor,” “Cliven Bundy and the Klan Komplex,” and “Ta-Nehisi Coates Goes There: Reparations.” (if you haven’t read that […]
[…] Bundy-ranch stand-off was discussed in “Rights Are for People Like Us” and “Cliven Bundy and the Klan Komplex“. I covered the Malheur Refuge occupation week-to-week earlier this year.] The government is […]