The Monday Morning Teaser

We’re coming down to the wire on the early primaries: Next Monday the Iowa caucuses happen, and eight days later I have to vote here in New Hampshire. As the Democratic race tightens up, I find myself wondering: So far all the Republicans have been running against Hillary, talking about Benghazi and emails and Bill’s escapades. If they started running against Bernie, what would that sound like?

Well, it turns out The New York Post jumped the gun on the anti-Bernie campaign, warning America that he’s a “diehard Communist”, and listing all sorts of “evidence” that has just about as much factual basis as … well, as the Benghazi stand-down order and all the other crap they’ve been throwing at Hillary.

But just because it’s crap doesn’t mean that it won’t work, or at least work well enough to distract the electorate from looking at the issues Bernie is trying to run on. Going back to Dukakis and the Pledge of Allegiance issue in 1988, all Democratic nominees spend a big chunk of their campaign wading through crap: swift-boating against Kerry, birtherism and “paling around with terrorists” against Obama, and so forth. Some nominees have had the political skill to cut through the noise and get the public to pay attention to their issues, and some haven’t. That has a lot to do with which ones won.

So what about Bernie and his “history” of diehard Communism? If he’s nominated, how will the Republicans use that against him and will he have the skills to deal with it? I’ll meditate on that in this week’s featured post “Smearing Bernie, a preview”. That should be out soon.

The weekly summary also has a lot of election coverage in it: Trump/Cruz is getting nasty. Hillary has been overstating the problems with Bernie’s healthcare plan, but Ezra Klein and Paul Krugman point out that there are some legitimate issues there. The Vanilla ISIS folks are still scaring the birds away in Oregon. Winter Storm Jonas clobbered the NY-Washington corridor, but left New England alone. Then there’s Flint, and verification that 2015 was the hottest year ever.  And of course, a couple guns-make-us-safer stories. That should be out by 10:30.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • Tammer  On January 25, 2016 at 8:30 am

    While I see the danger in directed attacks against Bernie like likes of which we haven’t seen yet, I don’t buy that Hillary has weathered the attacks against her successfully. Publicly, what’s left of her platform that she hasn’t hedged to avoid criticism? If you asked someone on the street what her priorities are, would they be able to mention anything besides “being a woman” and “sending emails”?

    • weeklysift  On January 25, 2016 at 8:55 am

      The point is more that they haven’t even started on Bernie yet.

  • Xan  On January 25, 2016 at 9:42 am

    Until the National Weather Service decides they do, winter storms don’t have names. Please stop.

  • Abby Hafer  On January 25, 2016 at 5:29 pm

    “I’ll mediate on that in this week’s featured post “Smearing Bernie, a preview”.” Perhaps you meant “meditate”?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: