A market economy is a tool—a valuable and effective tool—for organizing productive activity. A market society is a way of life in which market values seep into every aspect of human endeavor. It’s a place where social relations are made over in the image of the market. The great missing debate in contemporary politics is about the role and reach of markets. Do we want a market economy, or a market society?
— Michael J. Sandel, “What Isn’t For Sale?” (2012)
In this week’s sift:
- “If you can’t hear it from me …” — 3 voices that might get through to your conservative friends. A former climate-change denier explains why he stopped denying. A young Christian author tells her elders how their anti-gay focus is causing Christianity to lose her generation. And a successful entrepreneur explains why he isn’t a job-creator, but middle-class consumers are.
- Citizen of the highest bidder. New FaceBook billionaire Eduardo Saverin didn’t intend to become a symbol when he lowered his tax bill by renouncing his American citizenship. But right and left alike seized on his example to make points about taxes, patriotism, and whether anything is truly priceless.
- 196 People and other short notes. 196 individuals dominated Super-PAC funding in 2011. Austerity flounders in Europe. Harp seals should get jobs. Easter Island heads have buried bodies. Yet another similarity between the Taliban and Pat Robertson. And more.
- Book recommendation of the week: The New Religious Intolerance by Martha Nussbaum. For a bona fide University of Chicago philosopher, Nussbaum has a readable, engaging style. This short book looks at the fear-psychology that religious intolerance is based on, briefly presents the major philosophical theories of tolerance, illustrates how those ideas have played out historically, and then brings it all together to look at current anti-Muslim activism in both the U.S. and Europe.
- Last week’s most popular post. Everybody will support same-sex marriage by 2030 got 381 views. The most-clicked link was the iSideWith.com election quiz.
- What you can do. From time to time I’ve mentioned the Banyan Project (where I’m on the unpaid Board of Advisors; so is Dan Gillmor, author of We the Media). My friend Tom Stites has come up with a business plan for launching local news co-ops, whose loyalty will be to their reader/owners rather than to the advertisers. Banyan has reached the pilot-project stage, and is looking for start-up money through the journalism crowd-source funding site spot.us. Spot.us works by an interesting model: It uses crowd-sourcing to fund journalism that the for-profit media won’t do. You pledge money via your credit card, and that money is committed to spot.us projects in general. But your spot.us credits only go to the proposal if it meets its funding goal within the specified time period. (So your money doesn’t vanish into projects that never get off the ground. Otherwise you retain spot.us credits to invest in another project.) The Banyan proposal speaks for itself. You can decide for yourself whether it’s the kind of thing you want to support. I’ll vouch for Tom Stites (who used to be my editor at UU World) and for spot.us itself. Neither is a scam. I made a pledge this morning.
We used to think that revolutions are the cause of change. Actually it is the other way around: change prepares the ground for revolution
– Eric Hoffer, The Temper of Our Time (1967)
In this week’s sift:
- Everybody will support gay marriage by 2030. Support for gay rights has the most inexorable kind of momentum: generational. President Obama’s “evolution” may look risky now, but as gay-rights supporters come of age and opponents die, even the most homophobic politicians will have to capitulate — just like segregationist politicians did in the 1970s.
- 77 Cents, part 2: What if secretaries became programmers? In a miniature economy with only 30 occupations, eliminating the difference between male-dominated occupations and female-dominated ones only knocks 3 cents off the pay gap. Equalizing pay within the 30 occupations knocks 12 cents off.
- Does Romney’s bullying matter? and other short notes. The important thing isn’t what Mitt Romney did half a century ago; it’s how well his reaction today fits the story his critics tell about him. What Mom really wanted. LBJ’s greatest moment. Maurice Sendak’s last interview. Why does college cost so much? And more.
- Last week’s most popular post. It was a slow week. Where the Jobs Are and other short notes was the most popular post with 140 views.
- This week’s challenge. The Wisconsin recall campaign is on: a rematch of Walker vs. Barrett. Between now and June 5, this the biggest race going, and it will have national implications. You can contribute to the Barrett campaign here.
All through the Depression influential voices warned about the dangers of excessive government spending, and as a result the job-creation programs of the New Deal were always far too small, given the depth of the slump. What the threat of war did was to finally silence the voices of fiscal conservatism, opening the door for recovery.
– Paul Krugman, End This Depression Now (2012)
In this week’s sift:
- 77 Cents. Who’s right about how much money women make and why?
- Gays Need Not Apply. Richard Grenell’s resignation tells us that the Religious Right has Mitt Romney on a very short leash.
- Where the Jobs Are and other short notes. A great chart compares the Bush and Obama recoveries. The biggest difference between them is in government jobs — up for Bush, down for Obama.
- Last week’s most popular post. Jesus Shrugged — why Ayn Rand and Christianity don’t mix got 357 views. It was another good week for short notes; Bad Arguments and other short notes was viewed 191 times. 41 of those viewers clicked yourlogicalfallacyis.com, making it the week’s most-clicked link.
- Book recommendation of the week. Probably I’ll say more about this next week, but Paul Krugman’s End This Depression Now is an excellent book. Nothing he says will surprise Krugman’s regular readers — or regular Sift readers, for that matter: He thinks the economy is suffering a failure of demand, which can be solved by more government stimulus spending, easy money by the Fed, and raising the inflation target to 4%. But it’s good to see all the pieces of Krugman’s view laid out end-to-end. He makes his case very clearly, and directly answers all the objections your friends are likely to raise.
The right ordering of economic life cannot be left to a free competition of forces. For from this source, as from a poisoned spring, have originated and spread all the errors of individualist economic teaching. … [F]ree competition, while justified and certainly useful provided it is kept within certain limits, clearly cannot direct economic life – a truth which the outcome of the application in practice of the tenets of this evil individualistic spirit has more than sufficiently demonstrated
– Pope Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno (1931)
In this week’s sift:
- Jesus Shrugged — why Christianity and Ayn Rand don’t mix. Rep. Paul Ryan can’t have it both ways: He can’t be a good Catholic as well as a good Randist. The Church is right not to let him wash his cruel budget in the blood of the lamb.
- How Understanding Should Liberals Be? Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind explains to liberals how conservatives can be good people too. But is there anything useful we can do with that information?
- Bad Arguments and other short notes. Logical fallacies, the pyramid of refutation, and excuses conservatives use when the facts prove them wrong. Plus: Obama jams and does comedy. MTP regulars condescend to argue with Rachel Maddow. Maybe high-fructose corn syrup doesn’t cause autism. Where to hear me Wednesday. And more.
- Last week’s most popular post. It’s rare for the short-notes post to be the most popular, but Working for the Man and other short notes was, with 161 views.
The human mind is a story processor, not a logic processor.
— Jonathan Haidt, The Righteous Mind (2012)
In this week’s sift:
- The Narratives of November. What matters at this point in the campaign isn’t the Electoral College, favorability ratings, or head-to-head polls. It’s whether either candidate can assemble believable stories explaining why he should be president and his opponent shouldn’t.
- Jobs, Hobbies, and Reflections on a Viral Post. The most common complaint about last week’s Rich People Don’t Have Jobs is that I co-opted the perfectly good word job. Why that seemed necessary opens a whole other can of worms.
- Working for the Man and other short notes. Private prison corporations, lobbyists, and industries that pay peanuts for prison labor have established an incestuous relationship with government. The Yes Men take on the Bank of America. The Vatican cracks down on American nuns. Environmental arguments against immigration are actually arguments against the poor. Plus links to a few other things I found worth reading this week.
- Book recommendation of the week: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, where this week’s quote comes from. It’s an important book for anybody who wants to influence politics (so I may give it a longer review in some future week). One key insight: It’s now possible to prove rationally that people are not rational. Intuition reacts to any situation first, and the rational mind then turns that intuition into a post-hoc argument that might convince somebody else. That’s not a glitch; it’s what the rational mind evolved to do. The possibility of using to reason to find truth is a happy accident that came later. Rational truth-finding hardly ever works except in subcultures (like the scientific community) that go to great lengths to foster it.
- Last week’s most popular post. Rich People Don’t Have Jobs was only the sixth 1000-view post since the Sift moved to weeklysift.com last summer. At last count it had 1156 views. It has a follow-up post (Jobs, Hobbies …) this week.
Men are afraid women will laugh at them. Women are afraid men will kill them.
— attributed to Margaret Atwood
In this week’s sift:
- Rich People Don’t Have Jobs. I don’t care how hard you work or how productive you are; if you don’t need the money you’re making, you don’t have a job, you have a hobby.
- The Sifted Bookshelf: “Delirium” by Nancy Cohen. A feminist historian reviews the last half century and determines that all the conventional wisdom about the culture wars is wrong.
- Girls Heart Republicans and other short notes. Herman Cain is just the guy to explain the gender gap. Mitch McConnell puts words in the mouth of his female senators. How “low-effort thought” leads to conservative views. Free Republic revolts against Romney. Four crazy legislators. Orrin Hatch “despises” the Tea Party. Abstinence-only sex education still doesn’t work. And a grandmother recalls her abortion, while hoping that her granddaughters will have the same rights she did.
- Last week’s most popular post. Seven Issues the Election Should Be About got 611 views. The most-clicked link went to Nicholas Kristof’s “Learning to Respect Religion“.
- Follow-ups on past articles. Now that ALEC is drawing public attention, more and more corporations are dropping out. I love whoever noticed the resemblance between John Derbyshire’s racist rant and this clip from Twelve Angry Men. And Derbyshire causes Slate’s William Saletan to make the roughly the same observation about racial profiling that George Zimmerman evoked in me: “drawing inferences about anyone based on race, sex, religion, or any other crude category is a lousy substitute for inspecting or interacting with that individual. If you tell people to protect themselves by avoiding interaction with the person they’re judging, you’re not just rationalizing racism. You’re perpetuating it.”
- This week’s challenge. I know it seems pointless to contribute money to political campaigns when you read about Super-PACs raising hundreds of millions, but it’s important that ordinary people throw the stubborn ounces of their weight onto the scale. Decide how much you can contribute this year and start looking for candidates who deserve more than just your vote.
Democracy don’t rule the world
You’d better get that in your head
This world is ruled by violence
But I guess that’s better left unsaid
— Bob Dylan, “Union Sundown” (1983)
In this week’s sift:
- Seven Issues the Election Should Be About. I have to confess I have low expectations of the Romney vs. Obama fall campaign: a lot of negative ads, deception, misdirection, and bad journalism. And that’s a shame, because this country needs a good and accurate airing of liberal and conservative views on a number of important issues.
- Democracy in Michigan: What Rachel Got Right and Wrong. Thursday, Rachel Maddow did a long segment on the abuses of democracy happening in Michigan. It’s a huge story that more people should be covering, but she also screwed it up a little. As the Daily Show used to say: “When news breaks, we fix it.”
- Too Racist for the National Review and other short notes. John Derbyshire just proved that it is possible to get yourself fired from National Review for being too racist; you should take a look at how far he had to go. Can Koch Industries be strip-searched? The coming War on State Universities. Executive pay is still going up. And more.
- Book recommendation of the week: I haven’t finished Nick Harkaway’s new novel Angelmaker yet, but it reminds me that Harkaway’s first novel, The Gone-Away World, is one of my favorite sci-fi novels ever. He’s John le Carre’s son, but his style resembles Neal Stephenson’s: original ideas in wild plots, lavishly written.
- Last week’s most popular posts. Rather than one big viral outbreak, last week’s traffic was distributed among Prejudice, Bigotry, and “Reasonable” Racism (242 views), Student Debt: the New Involuntary Servitude (221), and continuing interest in Trayvon Martin: the Racism Whites Don’t Want to See (an additional 141 views to total 592). Interestingly, August’s Why I Am Not a Libertarian continues to chug along, getting about 50 views a week. It’s now up to 21,924.
- This week’s challenge. While visiting Chicago recently, I discovered the Open Books used-book store. Its high-quality stock is donated, and its staff consists of volunteers who love books. (Every little sub-category has excellent staff recommendations, right down to “mysteries with a strong sense of place”.) Lots of cushy old furniture makes it a great hang space. With no expenses for staff or stock, there must be profits — they support literacy programs in the Chicago area. Use the comments to tell me about public-spirited non-profits in your area, or to give a shout-out to your locally-owned independent bookstore.
Money is the seed of money, and the first guinea is sometimes more difficult to acquire than the second million.
— Rousseau, Discourse on Inequality
St. Peter don’t you call me, ’cause I can’t go.
I owe my soul to the company sto’
— Merle Travis (sort of), “16 Tons“
In this week’s sift:
- Prejudice, Bigotry, and “Reasonable” Racism. How reasonable was George Zimmerman’s assumption that a black teen must be up to no good? And what should he have done next?
- Student Debt: The New Involuntary Servitude. Student debt is now over $1 trillion, guaranteeing that young people trying to move up in the world will spend a big chunk of their careers under compulsion rather than freedom. The half-truths about choice and responsibility that justify this situation need to be exposed.
- Supreme Panic and other short notes. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on ObamaCare this week, and liberals panicked. Should they? And what’s the right answer to the Broccoli Argument? A quantum theory of Romney. Massive solar energy spills. Hate crime laws misunderstood. “Cracked” strikes again. And more.
- Book recommendation of the week: Drift by Rachel Maddow. The Founders wanted a peaceful republic, suspected the martial ambitions of the Executive Branch, and so invested the war-declaring power in Congress, which they expected to drag its feet rather than rush to war. How did we get from there to the current situation, where presidents make war at will and Congress begs to get a seat at the table?
- Last weeks’ most popular post. Trayvon Martin: The Racism Whites Don’t Want to See got 451 views, and has a sequel this week. The most-clicked link was to Cara Santa Maria’s piece on the new Tennessee evolution law. (I guess that’s what happens when I describe someone as “a hot chick”.)
- Expand your vocabulary. The distinction this week’s lead article makes between prejudice and bigotry deserves to catch on.
By protecting the lawbreaking license for other powerful individuals, [the political and media classes] strengthen a custom of which they might avail themselves if they too break the law and get caught. It is a class-based, self-interested advocacy. That is why belief in this prerogative and the devotion to protecting it transcend political ideology, partisan affiliation, the supposed wall between political and media figures, and every other pretense of division within elite classes. — Glenn Greenwald, With Liberty and Justice For Some
In this week’s sift:
A perfect tragedy should … not be the spectacle of a virtuous man brought from prosperity to adversity: for this moves neither pity nor fear; it merely shocks us. … Nor, again, should the downfall of the utter villain be exhibited. A plot of this kind would, doubtless, satisfy the moral sense, but it would inspire neither pity nor fear; for pity is aroused by unmerited misfortune, fear by the misfortune of a man like ourselves. Such an event, therefore, will be neither pitiful nor terrible. There remains, then, the character between these two extremes — that of a man who is not eminently good and just, yet whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty.
— Aristotle, Poetics
In this week’s sift:
- The Tragedy of Mitt Romney. There was a good case to be made for electing Mitt Romney president, until he started running. Now he wants to be president so badly that he’ll say anything, even it means turning his back on his own greatest accomplishments. That’s a tragic flaw of Shakespearian proportions.
- Jim Crow Returns. When did use of the term voter fraud start to ramp up? In 1965, precisely when the Voting Rights Act banned the previous ways of disenfranchising minorities. Now Texas is trying to get the VRA declared unconstitutional.
- Walking Back Mr. Daisey and other short notes. This American Life did a whole episode on how it was conned by Mike Daisey. (I linked the original episode, so I’d better tell you about this one too.) It’s an interesting lesson in truth and journalism. Oklahoma doctors can lie to prevent an abortion. Pat Robertson is anti-family. Baseless rumors about ObamaCare. Did Goldman Sachs have a moral compass to lose? Public vs. private morality. A skypunch. And more.
- Book recommendation of the week: Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human by Richard Wrangham. Not the similarly-named book from the Hunger Games series, but a fascinating work of speculative anthropology. It turns out that with our current biology, humans can’t survive in the wild without cooking. So humans could not have discovered cooking. Some apes must have discovered it, and then evolved into humans.
- Last weeks’ most popular post. Where Are We on Citizens United? got 135 views. The most-clicked link was 6 Things Rich People Need to Stop Saying.
- This week’s challenge. Good challenges are hard to come up with. Help me out. Suggest some in the comments.