Category Archives: Weekly summaries

Each week, a short post that links to the other posts of the week.

Daddy Issues

When Elon tweets something and when Trump tweets something,
Republicans don’t know who their Daddy is.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

This week’s featured post is “Cracks in the MAGA Coalition“.

This week everybody was talking about Jimmy Carter

President Jimmy Carter died Sunday at the age of 100, after 22 months in hospice care.

Carter was president from 1977 to 1981. His single term was marred by high inflation and the Iranian hostage crisis, but looks much better in retrospect than it did at the time. I find myself pining for the roads not taken. Carter created possibilities which his successors did not pursue, and the world is worse for America’s failure to follow his lead.

Carter was the first president to recognize global warming as a problem. He installed solar panels on the White House roof (which his successor, Ronald Reagan, promptly removed). While the country did not take the path to sustainable energy he envisioned, much of the sustainable energy used today is based on research funded under his presidency. Rolling Stone makes the case that he was America’s Greatest Environmental President.

In 1978, he brought Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin together to negotiate the Camp David Accords. The two countries have not fought a war since, and for a time, peace in the Middle East seemed possible.

Today, Carter is best known for his post-presidency. He ran for president in 1976 as a born-again Christian, and his subsequent life exemplified the Christ-like values so often lacking in Evangelical leaders. He and his wife Rosalynn (who died in 2023 after 77 years of marriage) championed Habitat for Humanity, and into their 90s were still swinging hammers to build houses for the poor. The Carter Center has been a voice for peace, democracy, and human rights for more than 40 years.

After his presidency, he returned to his farm in Plains, Georgia. He regularly taught Sunday school classes at his church. (My sister recently posted a picture she and her husband took with the Carters after attending his class in 2015.)

His death should remind us all of an era when we expected our leaders to be virtuous people — and occasionally they even were.


Jay Kuo posted a charming memory about meeting Rosalynn Carter when he was a child.

and US expansion

Recently Trump has tweeted about a variety of possible “territorial expansions” of the US — conquests, really, because there’s no sign any of these folks want to be part of the MAGA empire.

Greenland. On December 22nd, Trump released a statement that “For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity.” Apparently, having Greenland continue as a territory of our NATO ally Denmark is not good enough.

And you’ll never guess why we have to take over Greenland: global warming. Here’s former Trump national security adviser Robert O’Brien on Fox News:

It’s strategically very important to the Arctic which is going to be the critical battleground of the future because as the climate gets warmer, the Arctic is going to be a pathway that maybe cuts down on the usage of the Panama Canal.

So climate change is a hoax when we’re talking about limiting the burning of fossil fuels, but it’s absolutely real when it justifies taking territory from our NATO allies or ruling indigenous peoples against their will.

Panama Canal. On Christmas, Trump charged that Chinese soldiers are operating in the Canal Zone illegally. (A Hong Kong based corporation has the contract to manage two ports near the Canal’s entrances. That’s the closest anyone has come to making sense out of Trump’s ridiculous claim.) He suggested that the spirit of the agreement through which the US returned the Zone to Panama in 1999 has been violated, and said he was going to demand it back.

James Fallows (who during the Carter administration was involved in formalizing the treaties that returned the Canal to Panama) covers all this in much more detail. The push to return the Canal to Panama, he says, originally came from the military, which doubted its ability to defend the Canal if the local population viewed it as an enemy occupation. (If you’re worried about Chinese influence now, imagine if they could arm an indigenous uprising.) That’s why he estimates the chances of the US actually retaking the Canal by force as “zero”.

The issues Trump raises about Chinese soldiers and discriminatory pricing are complete fantasies.

Fallows also points out that the Canal is a climate-change issue: Operating the locks requires water, and depends on rainfall in the local watershed. Lately that rainfall has been declining.

Canada. This is almost certainly trolling on Trump’s part. In his Christmas message he tried to appeal to Canada’s citizens: If they became “the 51st state”, he claimed, their taxes would go down and they’d reap all kinds of benefits. (Of course they’d also lose their health coverage, and their life expectancy would probably drop 3 1/4 years to match ours.)

I find myself unmoved by these visions, which I suspect are entirely vaporous. (In other words, I don’t expect to see US aircraft carriers move to menace Nuuk.) During Trump’s first term, Rachel Maddow used to say, “Watch what they do, not what they say“, implying that Trump might be doing something behind the scenes that contradicted his public rhetoric. The same thing applies here, but in reverse: He’s saying things that will excite his base and inflame his critics, but I suspect no action will result. So I refuse to be inflamed.

Liberals often suggest that Trump’s outlandish rhetoric is supposed to distract us from something else he’s doing. But here I think his own supporters are the target, and they’re supposed to overlook what he isn’t doing. Trump is not going to cut trillions from the federal budget, he’s not going to lower the price of eggs or gas, and if you’re not rich you won’t notice whatever tax cut you get. But if he can get his supporters excited about Greenland and Panama, they may not notice the bankruptcy of his other promises.

Fallows has this right: The point of Trump’s rhetoric is to stoke his followers’ sense of grievance.

and Matt Gaetz

Just as I was getting ready to post last week, the House Ethics Committee released its report on Matt Gaetz.

In sum, the Committee found substantial evidence of the following:

  • From at least 2017 to 2020, Representative Gaetz regularly paid women for
    engaging in sexual activity with him.
  • In 2017, Representative Gaetz engaged in sexual activity with a 17-year-old girl.
  • During the period 2017 to 2019, Representative Gaetz used or possessed illegal drugs, including cocaine and ecstasy, on multiple occasions.
  • Representative Gaetz accepted gifts, including transportation and lodging in
    connection with a 2018 trip to the Bahamas, in excess of permissible amounts.
  • In 2018, Representative Gaetz arranged for his Chief of Staff to assist a woman with whom he engaged in sexual activity in obtaining a passport, falsely indicating to the U.S. Department of State that she was a constituent.
  • Representative Gaetz knowingly and willfully sought to impede and obstruct the Committee’s investigation of his conduct.
  • Representative Gaetz has acted in a manner that reflects discreditably upon the House. Based on the above, the Committee concluded there was substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz violated House Rules, state and federal laws, and other standards of conduct prohibiting prostitution, statutory rape, illicit drug use, acceptance of impermissible gifts, the provision of special favors and privileges, and obstruction of Congress

The 42-page report outlines that “substantial evidence”. Gaetz’ protest is that the Justice Department also investigated him and did not press charges, which he (falsely) claims “exonerates” him.

Reading the report, you can see how many of the witnesses might not be credible in court, where a beyond-reasonable-doubt standard would apply to any criminal charges. In court, Gaetz’ refusal to answer questions or explain his actions would not count against him.

However, the evidence in the report is quite persuasive if the question is “Should this man be in Congress?” or “Should this man be Attorney General?”. I find it striking that the dissenting opinion at the end of the report says “While we do not challenge the Committee’s findings …” and only protests that the report should not have been released after Gaetz resigned from the House. In short, not even the Republicans on the committee were willing to defend Gaetz’ conduct or claim the process had been “weaponized” against him, as Gaetz himself claimed.

and you also might be interested in …

Whooping cough is on the rise, largely because fewer children are being vaccinated for it. Cases are up five times over last year’s totals.


You might naively think that as sea levels rise, they’ll rise the same amount everywhere. Apparently this is not true. The US Southeast seems unusually prone to sea-level rise, with an increase of seven inches since 2010 in some places.


Now that the Supreme Court has banned universities from considering race in their admissions process, Black enrollment in elite programs has dropped. Harvard Law School has 19 incoming Black students, down from 43 the previous year.


It makes headlines when police kill some unarmed person of color for no justifiable reason, but such incidents are comparatively rare. More significant, this WaPo article claims, are the less extreme but more-or-less constant abuses dished out to women, the poor, and the homeless.

I remember a similar point being made after the killing of Michael Brown started demonstrations and violence in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014. The national coverage focused on that particular death and the conflicting accounts of what really happened. To the community, though, the killing was just an extreme example of what they saw every day.


SkepChick thinks the case against black plastic utensils has been overblown.

and let’s close with something timely

Tomorrow is New Year’s Eve, when many of you will be tempted to make resolutions. Resolutions, as we all know, are extraordinarily hard to keep. The ideas always sound great: Who doesn’t want to exercise more and read more and learn a new language? But there are reasons you have lived your whole life so far without doing those things, and those reasons don’t go away just because you get a new calendar.

So more often than not, making a resolution is just setting yourself up for failure. But there is an alternative: CGP Grey suggests declaring a theme for your year rather than committing to specific goals you will probably not achieve.

So rather than commit to read one book a week, you could declare 2025 the Year of Reading. It’s a softer goal, one that will allow you to try, fail, and come back to try again. Or rather than committing to lose 15 pounds, run two miles a day, and become a vegetarian, you might declare a Year of Health. Each day, you might remind yourself that you’re trying to be healthier this year. And who knows? Maybe you will be.

Solutions

Murder is never the answer. Murder is not a healthy response to corruption. But it is healthy for people to fear that if they kill people for greed, they will be unsafe. … [T]he assassination of Brian Thompson is a wake-up call, a warning that if we don’t solve this problem politically, we may not have a choice about whether it’s solved with violence.

Cory Doctorow

This week’s featured post is “The ball is in Trump’s court“.

This week everybody was talking about the guy who killed the guy who killed people

On December 4, United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was gunned down on the street in Manhattan. When I wrote last week, a manhunt for the killer was underway. It was probably a far more extensive manhunt than would happen if you or I were murdered, because this is America and some lives are valued above others. The Black Lives Matter movement has called attention to one end of that spectrum. This is the other end.

Wednesday police caught the guy the were looking for. The arrested suspect is Luigi Mangione. He left a short note explaining the attack, which I have not been able to find a full text of. The Economist reports:

What could have inspired the killing? Mr Mangione’s short note suggested a calculating desire to wreak revenge on America’s health-care system. America, he correctly noted, has the most expensive health care in the world, but life expectancy has stagnated. “Many have illuminated the corruption and greed” in the system, he wrote. “Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

UNH’s pushback against the support received by the shooter hasn’t gone very well. An in-house video distributed to UNH employees leaked to the internet, and was scorched by comments from people whose lives have been affected by denied claims.

The most insightful commentary I’ve seen on this situation is by Cory Doctorow, who published a short story with a similar theme (people killing executives of companies that had harmed them) several years ago. So he had been thinking about this for a long time before it actually happened. He puts his finger on precisely why so many Americans hate health insurance companies in general and UNH in particular (because it is the worst of the lot): They routinely kill people for money.

Doctorow goes through UNH branch by branch and explains how each one kills people for money. And he expresses his general amazement not that the Thompson assassination happened, but that such killings don’t happen more often.

I don’t want people to kill insurance executives, and I don’t want insurance executives to kill people. But I am unsurprised that this happened. Indeed, I’m surprised that it took so long. It should not be controversial to note that if you run an institution that makes people furious, they will eventually become furious with you.

America is a place swimming in guns. Disgruntled Americans routinely shoot up venues that symbolize their unhappiness and despair: workplaces, schools, and so on. Why has it taken them so long to get to health insurance executives whose policies kill their loved ones?

The Buddhist corner of my brain reminds me that Thompson was a human being, and that all human beings deserve compassion. He undoubtedly had loved ones who will miss him dearly, and they deserve compassion too. But you know, the list of people deserving my compassion is long right now, and I don’t think I’ll get to Thompson or his family for quite a while. In the meantime, his heirs should take satisfaction in the millions of dollars he made by killing people.

I also suspect that Luigi Mangione will turn out to be no hero. But in some sense that doesn’t matter.

Here’s a quote I heard years ago and never traced to its source: Good karma is cost effective. That’s a further point Doctorow makes in different words. Maybe executives could spend less on guards and panic rooms if they gave people less reason to want to do them violence. Maybe corporations could spend less on public relations if they didn’t raise so much legitimate public hatred. Maybe executives could live freer happier lives with less money if they stopped being such monsters.


Adam Parkhomenko:

When right-wing scum tried to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, Republicans made excuses.

When a lunatic beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer, they made jokes.

And when Trump sent a mob to attack the Capitol, they made up lies.

Don’t lecture us about condemning violence.


Meanwhile, Trump and Vance took newly acquitted killer Daniel Perry to the Army-Navy game.

and bowing to the new overlord

There’s some debate over whether Senator Ernst is folding her opposition to Pete Hegseth or just temporizing until the FBI either validates the accusations against him or clears him. “I look forward to a fair hearing based on truth, not anonymous sources.” is only an endorsement if the truth favors Hegseth.

Meanwhile, retired priest Father Nathan Monk analyzes Hegseth’s controversial tattoos. J. D. Vance has tried to spin the reaction against those tattoos as anti-Christian bias, but Monk disagrees.

Alt-right accounts often utilize Crusader memes as ways to threaten violence without explicitly stating it. This has resulted in a resurgence of the use of symbols associated with the Crusades by Christian Nationalist groups, including the Crusader’s Cross and the phrase Deus Vult. … If [Hegseth] were a Roman Catholic, I think it would be hard to place him in the hate speech category, because there is a complicated history with the Jerusalem cross. It might have been a symbol he was accustomed to or had some major significance. However, that is not the case. These are not symbols of his Protestant upbringing or linked to any history or heritage, past or present, but symbols of the Crusaders that are heavily being used by Christian Nationalists to promote violence and hatred. …

This isn’t a case of his faith being called into question but his beliefs of supremacy, superiority, and sovereignty being actively called out by other Christians who are tired of the Prince of Peace yet again being used as a weapon of war against the very types of people Jesus called us to love.


ABC settled a defamation suit with Trump, which they probably would have won. At the very least, Trump would have been deposed under oath, which I’m sure he was anxious to avoid. In the settlement, ABC will pay $15 million to a “presidential foundation and museum”, pay another million for Trump’s attorney fees, and issue an apology.

Knowing the history of Trump and charities, I expect a big chunk of the $15 million to wind up in his pocket.


Michelle Goldberg:

I’m trying to put my finger on what’s happening with this great capitulation to Trump — ABC News, Chris Wray, the Democrats signing up to work with DOGE, Mark Benioff, etc. It’s like you can feel the air going out of an entire social order.


Big tech companies lined up to give $1 million each to Trump’s inaugural fund.

His 2017 inauguration was rife with corruption, ultimately resulting in a $750K settlement with the DC attorney general.


This is one small step in the Orbanization of America:

Yesterday I pulled overt references of queerness off my site, my very successful store that sells my books that have queer main characters. Because a few days ago, Meta emailed saying my advertising on their platform will be restricted – my site was categorized as “sexuality and gender identity.”

I don’t necessarily blame Novae Caelum for doing this, because this is the new world: If you want stay in business, even the business of writing novels with queer characters, you need to trim your sails a little. Stories like this won’t ever rise to the mass media’s attention, but there will be thousands of them.

and you also might be interested in …

A heartbreaking story in yesterday’s NYT: Jaime Cachua is a 33-year-old undocumented Mexican immigrant who came to Rome, Georgia before his first birthday. He has no memories of Mexico, is not in contact with any relatives there, and speaks Spanish badly. He is married to an American citizen and they have 7-year-old twins who are citizens because they were born here. By all accounts, he is a productive member of a small-town society.

He’d lived all but the first year of his life in Rome, a riverside town of 40,000 in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. He was a customer service specialist at the local car dealership, a worship team volunteer at church and the host of family barbecues in his neighborhood cul-de-sac.

But Rome is Trump territory, and if Trump keeps his promises, Jaime will be deported to a country where he knows no one. Rome is represented in Congress by Marjorie Taylor Greene, who says she can’t wait for the mass deportations to start. Jaime’s closest friends, even Sky, the man who considers Jaime a surrogate son, voted for Trump.

Jaime’s conversations with Sky are surreal in the way that so many conversations with Trump supporters are: Sky simply doesn’t believe that what is happening is happening. Trump just wants to deport all the bad Mexicans, and Jaime is a good Mexican. Of course he’ll be fine. Sky never explains how he thinks millions of people can be deported “very quickly” while paying close attention to the nuances of each case.


Another situation where the implementation details will matter is the 1-6 pardons Trump keeps promising. Are we talking about people who got swept up in the crowd and walked through doors already broken down? Or about the people who broke those doors? Or the people who battled police to get into a position to break down the doors? What about planners like Enrique Tarrio or Stewart Rhodes, who were convicted of seditious conspiracy?

It’s important to remind people that none of the 1-6 convicts were sent to jail for supporting Trump, which has never been a crime and shouldn’t be. They were convicted of breaking specific laws.

Similarly, they weren’t convicted by the media or by Democrats. They were convicted by juries of their peers, who heard evidence from both sides and unanimously decided that they were guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.


South Korea failed in its first attempt to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol, who briefly declared martial law two weeks ago, but Saturday they got it done. 12 members of Yoon’s party flipped against him, and that was enough for the needed 2/3 majority of the Parliament.

The spotlight will now move to the country’s constitutional court, whose six justices must vote unanimously in favor to uphold parliament’s decision. Yoon will now be suspended from office while the court deliberates. It has 180 days to rule on Yoon’s future. If it approves the motion, South Koreans must elect a new president within 60 days of its ruling.


A new government is forming in Syria, after the previous tyrant escaped to Moscow. NBC News analyzes “How Syria’s Bashar al-Assad fell so quickly“. It will be a while before we really know what to think. Many Americans were optimistic back when Fidel Castro overthrew Cuba’s previous tyrant or the ayatollahs replaced Iran’s Shah.


Paul Krugman has retired from his NYT column, but he has shifted his energy to a Substack blog “Paul Krugman wonks out“, which is more focused on his specialty, economics. In this post from Friday, he points out that Trump’s desire for both a trade surplus and foreign capital coming to America violates arithmetic. The number of dollars in foreign hands is finite (i.e. dollars can only be created by the Fed in the US), and foreigners can either buy US products with their dollars or invest them in US assets. They can’t do both with the same dollars.


President Macron has appointed a new French prime minister, Francois Bayrou, following a vote of no confidence in the previous government. Bayrou has a deep hole to dig himself out of. He first needs to assemble a new cabinet that draws majority support in the French Parliament, and then get a new budget passed.

and let’s close with something big

Lots of people have advent calendars this time of year. But nobody has one as big as Gengenbach in Germany.

The Bible tells the story of Jesus’ birth, and many elements of traditional Christmas celebrations originate there: a manger scene, wise men, shepherds, angels, and so on. But nothing in the Bible anticipates Christmas as a holiday, let alone one with gatherings of the extended family and huge feasts. (Mary and Joseph spent the first Christmas in a stable far away from their relatives. I doubt they ate well.)

In particular, the Christmas-anticipating season of Advent is wholly non-Biblical. It seems to have originated in Europe in the fourth century. Advent calendars first appeared in the 19th century in Germany. They were still catching on in the US when President Eisenhower was shown opening one with his grandchildren in 1953. The first chocolate-filled Advent calendars appeared in the 1950s.

But Germany still does it best: Every year, the town of Gengenbach turns its entire town hall into a giant Advent calendar.

Every evening, they raise the shade of another window to reveal a new picture behind it, just as the owner of an Advent calendar unfolds a flap to procure a candy — or these days, a lipstick or a spice sachet.

“It’s quite spectacular because everything gets dark and then we have a spot on the window and then it’s like a little bit of a curtain that goes up,” said Michael Foell of Gengenbach’s tourism bureau. “Everyone is just watching with big eyes and mouths open.”

Promises

“I’ll quit drinking if you let me run the Pentagon” is the most alcoholic thing anybody has ever said.

frequent social media comment

This week’s featured post is: “The Power of ‘Again’“.

This week everybody was talking about instability abroad

The 54-year regime of the Assad family in Syria is no more, and Assad himself is in Moscow. The main victorious rebel group used to be part of al Qaeda, so they may not be the good guys either.

The general situation — which I imagine she hopes also applies to Putin’s government in Russia — was well described by Kira Rudik of the Ukrainian Parliament:

First, regimes fall very slowly, and nobody believe they are collapsing. And then, regimes fall fast.


Speaking of fast, Tuesday night South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law, but Koreans who went to bed early slept through the whole thing. He made his announcement about 10:30 p.m. and reversed course by 4 a.m.

Yoon’s declaration looked like a typical coup announcement:

The decree banned all political activities and limited media freedom. It was the first use of such emergency powers since the country’s military dictatorship fell in the late 1980s.

But it didn’t last.

The counter-reaction came swiftly. Thousands of protesters took to the streets chanting “Arrest him!” The mood was one of outrage mixed with utter shock. … Political opposition to Mr Yoon mobilised throughout the night. The DP called the president’s declaration “essentially a coup”. Han Dong-hoon, the head of Mr Yoon’s own People’s Power Party (PPP) came out against the move. As heavily armed troops stormed the parliament, the 190 lawmakers who had barricaded themselves inside the chamber, a majority of the 300-strong body, voted unanimously to revoke the president’s decree just two hours after it took effect. The armed forces began to leave shortly afterwards.

Saturday, a vote to impeach Yoon failed. Impeachment requires a 2/3 vote, and the opposition party has only 192 of the 300 seats. Ruling when that large a majority wants you gone doesn’t seem like a stable situation, but Im not sure where it goes from here.


Wednesday, the French Parliament passed a motion of no confidence in the government of Prime Minister Michel Barnier after only 12 weeks. It is a political blow to President Macron, who will need to nominate a new prime minister acceptable to the Assembly.

and the plutocracy

Wednesday the CEO of United Healthcare was gunned down in the center of Manhattan while walking across the street from his hotel to another hotel where he was scheduled to address an investors’ conference.

The attack looks planned, but police haven’t caught the guy or publicly identified him yet, so any speculation about his motive is necessarily shaky. (Though apparently the bullets had words written on them: “delay”, “deny”, and “depose”, which apparently have denial-of-coverage associations.) But I will note this, which I can observe on my own social media feed: There’s remarkably little sympathy for the CEO.

UNH is the health insurance company that denies the most claims, by a wide margin. If the assassin turns out to be someone who lost a loved one because UNH wouldn’t pay for care, he’s going to become a hero to some substantial segment of the population. I’m reminded of how during the Depression bank robber John Dillinger became “a folk hero to Americans disillusioned with failing banks and the ineffective federal government”.

As Maureen Tkacik notes at The American Prospect:

Only about 50 million customers of America’s reigning medical monopoly might have a motive to exact revenge upon the UnitedHealthcare CEO.

The article goes on to describe Medicare Advantage — the privatized part of Medicare — as “ensconced in fraud”.

UnitedHealth, which insures close to a third of the nation’s MA patients, is to a great extent the architect of this vast privatization project, which has in recent years become the undisputed profit center of both the insurance giant and the American health care industry generally. … UnitedHealth has been a particular trailblazer in the art of managing “risk” by simply denying claims for treatments and procedures it unilaterally deems unnecessary.

Princeton sociology professor Zeynep Tufekci writes in the NYT:

I’ve been studying social media for a long time, and I can’t think of any other incident when a murder in this country has been so openly celebrated.

She also makes an extended comparison between the present and another era of US history marked by an extreme gap between rich and poor, as well as a surge in political violence: the Gilded Age.

In his blog The ReFrame, A. R. Moxon contrasts the response to CEO Bryan Thompson’s murder to the death of Jordan Neely, a homeless man strangled on the New York subway. He notes how violent death is discussed differently when the victim is prominent.

Everyone involved in both stories is a human being, unless you ask our society—the parts of it where power is negotiated and narratives of permission are generated, anyway. In the corridors of power, the halls of justice, on platforms of influence, some people in our society are clearly deemed to be human beings— their lives justified, their potential valuable, their deaths tragedies—while others are deemed to be nothing more than a danger, a drain, a discomfort, a problem to be solved by making them not exist quite so much. The primary dividing line appears to be whether you’ve got money, or, failing that, whether you can make somebody money.

I am neither advocating terrorism nor planning any myself, but the Powers That Be need to recognize how consistently they’ve been shutting down nonviolent paths towards justice. (Trump’s election, and the subsequent demise of any consequences for his law-breaking, is not the main reason, but it puts the cherry on the sundae.) As JFK said: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”


Meanwhile, how did Elon Musk get into a position to slash your Social Security? Simple: He bought his way in.

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, spent over a quarter of a billion dollars in the final months of this year’s election to help Donald J. Trump win the presidency, federal filings revealed on Thursday.

That’s just the raw total of dollars Musk spent to boost Trump. It doesn’t count the in-kind contribution of his X/Twitter platform which he turned into a propaganda arm of the Trump campaign.

Axios makes the case the Musk’s $44 billion purchase of Twitter — which has become a disaster according to the ordinary way corporate takeovers are judged — is actually paying off for him, due to the political power it has allowed him to accumulate, particularly if he can use that power to boost his other businesses. But if you are one of the unfortunate investors who went in with him, looking to grow the value of Twitter, too bad for you.

This is a pattern we see all too often: The Right makes false claims against liberal institutions and individuals in order to justify doing those very things when they’re in a position to do so. Biden was not elected via some conspiracy of Facebook, Twitter, and various Soros-funded organizations in 2020, as Trump often claimed. But through X and his vast political spending, Musk definitely put a thumb on the electoral scale in 2024.

Jay Kuo discusses the unethical campaign tactics Musk funded, including false-positive ads, where Muslims would be micro-targeted for an ad that appeared to be for Jews, praising Kamala Harris for her Zionism, while Jews were micro-targeted with ads that appeared to be for Muslims and praised her willingness to cut off arms shipments to Israel.

This tactic goes back at least to Edwin O’Connor’s classic political novel The Last Hurrah published in 1956. In it, old Boston pols reminisce about the old days, when you might send a fake Catholic priest to canvass for your opponent in a Protestant neighborhood.


Owner Patrick Soon-Shiong is doing his best to ruin The Los Angeles Times. He intervened during the campaign to stop his newspaper from endorsing Kamala Harris and running a series criticizing Trump. His most recent idea is to incorporate an AI bias-meter into news stories, with the idea of making the paper more “fair and balanced“. His “combative” interview with Oliver Darcy gives us an indication of what that might mean.

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times, believes it is an “opinion,” not a matter of fact, that Donald Trump lies at a higher rate than most other politicians.

“A lot of politicians lie a lot,” Soon-Shiong declared to me on the phone Tuesday evening, pushing back against the assertion that Trump is an abnormality in American politics.

In his explanation of why he has resigned from the LAT, Senior Legal Columnist Harry Litman (who I know as a contributor to MSNBC) takes a different view:

[T]he idea of balance is fundamentally misplaced when on one side of the balance is a sociopathic liar like Donald Trump. … In that context, the bromide of just being balanced is a terrible dereliction of journalists’ first defining responsibility of reporting the truth. Soon-Shiong apparently would have the Times deliver an on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand presentation to readers. But there is no “other hand.” Trump is an inveterate liar, and journalists have a defining responsibility to call that out.

and the Hunter pardon

When I wrote last week, President Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter was fairly recent. But now that I’ve had a chance to read many opinions on it, I feel like I got it right the first time: It would be nice to be able to draw a clear moral line between Biden’s use of pardons and Trump’s, but if I had a son I wouldn’t sacrifice him to achieve that goal.

Hunter has committed a few fairly minor crimes and has already been over-prosecuted for them by a Trump-appointed special prosecutor that Biden left in place. Investigations by partisan House committees repeatedly over-promised what they could prove against Hunter, producing a lot of click-bait headlines in right-wing media, but little else. Four more years of Hunter investigations and/or prosecutions would be a miscarriage of justice.

I don’t see the new administration being restrained by the precedents of past administrations, so I think the impact of Biden restraining his mercy would have been mainly rhetorical. And I’ll make a prediction along those lines: If the GOP needs to break a filibuster to achieve one of its goals — a national abortion ban, say — the fact that Democrats preserved the filibuster when they had the majority will mean nothing.

Here’s the WaPo’s Ann Telnaes’ comment on Speaker Johnson’s double standard:

Meanwhile, Ron Filipkowski:

Virtually every question today at the WH Press briefing was about the Hunter pardon, as if that is the thing the American people care about most right now. The DC press is so disconnected from the American public and serves them poorly more often than not.

and you also might be interested in …

Can you imagine the response if Biden had proposed selling gold out of Fort Knox to bid up the price of his political allies’ products? Well, that’s what the Bitcoin Reserve Bill would do if passed:

Four days later, Sen [Cynthia] Lummis [of Wyoming] introduced to the 118th Congress the “Boosting Innovation, Technology, and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide Act of 2024”, or BITCOIN Act. The bill mandates that all bitcoin held by any Federal agency be transferred to the Treasury to be held in a strategic bitcoin reserve. In addition, it mandates that the Secretary of the Treasury purchase “not more than 200,000 Bitcoins per year over a 5-year period, for a total acquisition of 1,000,000 Bitcoins.” That 1,000,000 Bitcoins is then to be held by the Treasury for at least 20 years before they can consider selling it

Chris Hayes skewered this idea.


Covid deniers often claim that the pandemic death totals were overstated: Anybody who died with Covid supposedly was counted as dying of Covid, even if they got hit by a truck.

But the officially reported deaths are not the only way to access the death toll. There’s also the demographic concept of excess deaths. Demographers are really good at looking at a population and predicting about how many people will die during normal times. (That’s why life insurance is a reliable business rather than a crapshoot.) When something exceptional happens (like a war, a famine, or an epidemic), people die in greater numbers than demographers would ordinarily expect: In other words, excess deaths.

So that provides a way to check whether a pandemic is real or exaggerated. If doctors are misreporting ordinary deaths as pandemic deaths, then the reported deaths from the disease would be greater than the excess deaths. But in fact it goes the other way. Excess deaths during the pandemic were far higher than reported Covid deaths. So by that measure the Covid pandemic was far more deadly than previously thought.


Atlantic’s Adam Serwer points out something I’ve been noticing also: MAGA wants to make heroes out of villains, or just plainly doesn’t get that characters are villains. Tony Soprano, Walter White, Homelander, Judge Dredd — these are not good people, and they were created as cautionary tales, not as heroes to emulate.


When Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” went to Mar-a-Lago a few weeks ago, I decided not to join the chorus of people calling them out. Maybe they weren’t kissing the ring; I decided to wait and see.

Well, now we’re seeing. They’re bowing down. Wednesday, David Frum appeared on MJ to comment on the Pete Hegseth nomination, which was in trouble because of reports of his drinking — the most recent being reports that colleagues at Fox News had been worried about him. Frum gave a substantive comparison of Hegseth to a failed defense secretary nominee from 1989: John Tower, who was similarly reported to drink excessively. Frum segued into his commentary by quipping “If you’re too drunk for Fox News, you’re very, very drunk indeed.”

After Frum had been excused, Brzezinski came on to apologize to Fox News. Frum responded in The Atlantic:

It is a very ominous thing if our leading forums for discussion of public affairs are already feeling the chill of intimidation and responding with efforts to appease.

Thursday morning, Scarborough began the show with what TV Insider described as a “20 minute rant” and Dan Fromkin called “whiny” and “defensive”, denying that he or the show was afraid of Trump, and defending again the trip to Mar-a-Lago.

Fromkin observed that there is no journalistic reason to have an off-the-record conversation with Trump.

Going off the record with a source is a compact and a sign of respect. You grant a source anonymity on the assumption that you will get valuable information in return. But Trump holds nothing back in public. Nothing he says off the record will be revelatory. Certainly nothing will be revelatory and true. Nothing will suddenly give you a better “read on the man.”

So what is it then? It’s bending the knee. It’s obedience.

and let’s close with something unexpectedly awesome

Just this weekend, I bought tickets for only my second post-Covid airline trip. I went out of my way to get non-stop flights, because getting stuck in airports is not a high-value experience. At least not most of the time.

But then there’s the Jewel at Singapore’s Changi airport, which apparently has become a tourist attraction in itself. Why can’t my country have nice things?

Weak Points

Whoever is winning at the moment will always seem to be invincible.

– George Orwell, “Second Thoughts on James Burnham” (1946)

I have admired the quote above for years, but it wasn’t until yesterday that I looked up the larger context. Often, well-loved quotes are taken out of context, and were never really intended to say what we hear in them today, so reading the whole paragraph or page or chapter can ruin the effect. But the context of this quote makes it even more relevant to the present moment:

Power worship blurs political judgement because it leads, almost unavoidably, to the belief that present trends will continue. Whoever is winning at the moment will always seem to be invincible. If the Japanese have conquered south Asia, then they will keep south Asia for ever, if the Germans have captured Tobruk, they will infallibly capture Cairo; if the Russians are in Berlin, it will not be long before they are in London: and so on. This habit of mind leads also to the belief that things will happen more quickly, completely, and catastrophically than they ever do in practice. The rise and fall of empires, the disappearance of cultures and religions, are expected to happen with earthquake suddenness, and processes which have barely started are talked about as though they were already at an end.

This week’s featured post is “Resisting, eventually“. It describes my election hangover, and a corresponding unwillingness to commit to a resistance strategy, or even research one adequately.

This week everybody was still talking about Trump’s nominations

Now that Matt Gaetz is gone, the next nominee likely to fall is Pete Hegseth, chosen by Trump to run the Pentagon. We’ve known for two weeks that he paid a woman to drop her accusation of sexual assault in 2017, but a single episode of sexual assault is almost a badge of honor in TrumpWorld, so his nomination was still viable.

But then Friday, the NYT published an email Hegseth received from his mother in 2018:

You are an abuser of women — that is the ugly truth and I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around, and uses women for his own power and ego. You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth. … … On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say… get some help and take an honest look at yourself

Sunday, The New Yorker detailed a history of Hegseth’s alcohol abuse and financial impropriety in addition to a pattern of sexual harassment. He headed two veteran-focused political groups, and each time was dismissed after overspending the organization’s funds for drunken staff parties. Hegseth’s drunken exploits include trying to get up on stage with the dancers at a strip club, and on several occasions being carried up to his room by co-workers.

The Republican senators whose votes Hegseth needs are probably impervious to sexual-assault claims, since they’ve already had to make so many excuses for Donald Trump’s behavior. “Don’t believe women” could be the party motto at this point. But a Defense Secretary who is often drunk and out-of-control is a different problem. From the New Yorker article:

Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut and the senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, described the report of Hegseth’s drinking as alarming and disqualifying. In a phone interview, Blumenthal, who currently leads the Senate committee that will review Hegseth’s nomination, told me, “Much as we might be sympathetic to people with continuing alcohol problems, they shouldn’t be at the top of our national-security structure.” Blumenthal went on, “It’s dangerous. The Secretary of Defense is involved in every issue of national security. He’s involved in the use of nuclear weapons. He’s the one who approves sending troops into combat. He approves drone strikes that may involve civilian casualties. Literally life-and-death issues are in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, and entrusting these kinds of issues to someone who might be incapacitated for any reason is a risk we cannot take.”

It would be bad enough if Hegseth were the kind of drunk who just quietly falls asleep. But the stories about him point to a drunk who loses inhibitions and does stupid things.


The hits keep coming. Trump’s nominee for FBI director is Kash Patel, whose main qualification is a slavish devotion to Trump.

The pattern here is something we often see from the Right: Democrats are falsely accused of something so that Republicans can “respond” by actually doing that very thing. In this case, the “something” is weaponizing the Justice Department. (The archetypal example is Fox News, whose right-wing bias parallels a grossly exaggerated notion of left-wing media bias. A completely different example is the Florida education system, which Governor DeSantis is turning into the indoctrination program he falsely claimed it already was. “DeSantis’s anti-education crusade is doubly authoritarian – most obviously in its use of state power to suppress ideas and information, but also in its more subtle assumption that teaching is ultimately about imposing doctrines of one sort or another.”)

The Biden Justice Department was not weaponized. Every Trump investigation began with probable cause for suspecting an actual crime, and every indictment was backed by evidence that probably would have led to convictions if Trump-favoring judges had allowed the cases to go to trial. That’s law enforcement, not weaponization.

But a Patel-led FBI and a Bondi-led Justice Department won’t bother with niceties like probable cause and proof beyond reasonable doubt. Look for people to be investigated because they are Trump critics, and for rumors of wide-ranging conspiracies to regularly leak to Fox News. Most of these investigations won’t lead to indictments, or even identification of the specific laws supposedly violated. Those that do will produce show trials that juries quickly dismiss with not-guilty verdicts.

The Durham investigation from Trump’s first term is the model here. Trump claimed it would uncover “the crime of the century“, and right-wing media regularly gave credence to Durham-inspired conspiracy theories that led to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. But only minor figures went to trial, and they were charged with minor offenses falling far short of the vast conspiracies Durham was supposed to reveal. Only two went to trial, and they were quickly acquitted.

Such prosecutions have three goals: generating a series of enraging headlines inside the right-wing echo chamber, making targets spend vast sums of money on lawyers, and intimidating people who fear falling out of Trump’s favor.


It’s hard to sort out the pluses and minuses of Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter. Undoubtedly, we will hear about this every time Trump makes a self-interested pardon, which he will do often, beginning with the January 6 rioters and seditionists.

But it’s also clear that a Bondi/Patel Justice Department would never leave Hunter alone. His father let the Trump-appointed prosecutor do whatever he wanted, with the result that Hunter was prosecuted far more intensely than an ordinary person who committed the same offenses would have been.

Biden is anticipating injustice from the Trump administration and acting to avert it. It would be better to wait for the injustice to begin, so that it’s obvious to everyone, but by then his power to mitigate it would have evaporated. He had to act now or not at all.

The larger cause of democracy probably would have been better served if Biden had been willing to sacrifice his son to it. (I’ll let you decide whether there’s a Christian metaphor worth inserting here.) But I don’t blame him for not letting that happen.


This account of budget-director-nominee and Project 2025 author Russell Vought is genuinely scary. Basically, he believes we’re in a “post-constitutional” situation. Our government has drifted so far from what he thinks the Constitution calls for that extra-constitutional presidential authority is needed to pull us back.

and Russia and its ally Syria

The Biden administration imposed a truly biting sanction on Russian banks two weeks ago, leading to this:

Against a backdrop of high inflation and fears over the value of the currency, Russia’s central bank has already lifted interest rates to 21% this year.

We’ll learn a lot about the state of the world in January, when we see whether Trump starts relaxing Russian sanctions. If he does, and he doesn’t get some major concession in return, we can be pretty sure that the rumors of kompromat are true.


It also looks like a bad time to be a Russian ally. Rebels in Syria have taken Aleppo, the country’s second-largest city, with surprising ease. The Assad regime, which was propped up by Russian intervention when it seemed to be falling over a dozen years ago, now has few allies it can count on: Russia pulled its troops out to fight in Ukraine, while Iran and its various proxy groups have their hands full dealing with Israel.

Meanwhile, the former Soviet nation of Georgia has seen days of massive demonstrations against the ruling party, which has been leaning towards Russia and away from joining the EU.

and tariff skirmishes

This week included a major reminder of what a Trump administration is like. Trump will troll us by threatening to do something, get some kind of response from the targets of his threats, falsely claim that the response is a concession, and do a victory lap for “winning” the exchange. Nothing has actually happened, but he has exhausted his opponents and given his followers a fake “victory” to crow about.

Trump loves tariffs, because this is the area where presidential power is its most authoritarian. Congress has largely delegated this part of its taxing power to the President — something the Supreme Court should (but won’t) look at in view of its emerging non-delegation doctrine — so he really can just decree something and see it happen.

Past presidents have used the tariff power for economic purposes: If we don’t like how a country treats our exports, we’ll put a tariff on their exports to us. Most of the time this has been a warning shot to induce another country to negotiate. But Trump views tariffs in a far more expansive way: If we don’t like anything another country does, we can punish them by taxing their goods. (Of course, the tax will be paid by the American consumer, but it should hurt the targeted country’s sales.)

So last Monday Trump tweeted that he would impose 25% across-the-board tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada unless they solve our immigration and drug problems.

This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!

He then had a conversation with the Mexican president, who told him that Mexico is already doing what he asked for (as part of an agreement negotiated by Biden). Trump then claimed victory. Does that mean the tariffs won’t happen? Who can say?

Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau also talked with Trump, but the outcome was less clear.

David Atkins summarized what I’ve been thinking:

The next four years are in large part going to be Trump taking credit for what Biden and Harris already did.

Inflation is headed down, fentanyl deaths are down, border apprehensions are down — in a few months we’re going to hear Trump claim all these accomplishments as his own.

and you also might be interested in …

ProPublica has been reporting on women with problem pregnancies who have died because state abortion bans delayed their emergency treatment. (In general, life-of-the-mother exceptions are too narrow. Problems that don’t seem immediately life-threatening can go south faster than doctors can react.) You might think that the states would respond by issuing new treatment guidelines to keep similar deaths from happening in the future, but their response is going in a different direction entirely: They’re making it harder for the public to learn about such cases.

In other words, dead women is bad optics, not bad policy.


Paul Waldman points out something that’s been bugging me too: Critiques of Kamala Harris’ campaign or the Democratic message in general don’t have much to do with the actual campaign or message. He’s not arguing that everything was great and no changes are needed,

But if you want to alter your strategy in effective ways, you have to begin with a clear understanding of reality. Which is why it’s important to puncture some of the myths that keep getting repeated.

Short version: The election was very close, and not a groundswell repudiation of everything the Democrats stand for. Harris ran a centrist campaign rather than an identity-politics campaign. She focused her message on kitchen-table issues rather than culture-war issues. People can legitimately argue about why her message didn’t get through to enough voters, but they shouldn’t distort what her message actually was.


I continue to be skeptical of carbon-capture as a solution to climate change, but this piece of research does look promising.


They’re sad and depressing, but you should check out the comments on this Jess Piper post to BlueSky:

What does a defunded school look like?

A constant turnover of new teachers because of the pay rate. No science lab. No band. No track. No real cafeteria, just a warming center for pre-packaged foods. No school nurse. A lack of bus drivers and AP/dual credit classes.

Ask me how I know…


Oklahoma and Texas can mandate that schools teach the Bible, but to get the results Christian nationalists are aiming for, eventually they’re going to have to specify who teaches the Bible and how.

and let’s close with something colorful

In my father-in-law’s final days, my wife was managing his affairs, so his mail came to us. He died years ago and we’ve moved twice since, but somehow we still get fund-raising letters from a few of the bizarre-to-us Catholic organizations he supported. The mailings, when we don’t just toss them unopened, can offer a glimpse into a different world.

At the most basic level, fund-raising letters are all the same no matter who they come from. Whether the bogeyman is Trump, the Deep State, or the Elders of Zion, somebody is doing something terrifying that there is still time to head off if you send money.

Recently a mailing from America Needs Fatima in Hanover, PA warned us about “the growth of Satanism and its expanding legion of followers” — who never contact me despite all the weird web sites I wander through while I’m doing research for this blog. My wife collects Tarot decks, which seems like it should have put the Mark of the Beast on our mailbox a long time ago. But nothing.

Anyway, the growth of Satanism in general is too vague a development for a truly scary mailing, so ANF found something more specific: WalMart is helping the Satanists target America’s children.

“How?” you might ask. Well, the WalMart web site (not the stores, apparently) offers a “Satanist” coloring book: Let’s Summon Demons: A Creepy Coloring & Activity Book.

My first thought was that ANF was making this up, but journalism requires fact-checking, so I went to the WalMart web site and found it: available for $12.04.

HOME ALONE? PART OF AN OTHERWORLDLY CULT? Whether coloring alone or having fun together with others equally versed in the occult, paranormal, and witchcraft, this is the PERFECT coloring and activity book to pass the time until the great [your chaotic primordial god here] descends.

Sounds pretty serious, don’t you think? It’s also at Amazon, for the same $12.04, whose numerological significance escapes me. (BTW: I question the author’s magical technique: The boy in the cover drawing is breaking the summoning circle.)

Might your unsuspecting-but-curious child happen across this by accident while browsing for other kinds of indoctrination? Not likely. I scrolled through many screens worth of WalMart-offered coloring books and didn’t find it. Technically WalMart classifies it under “Other”. Amazon says it’s “Novelty”.

However, if your child is already versed in summoning the occult via Google (as I just did), anything can happen.

And once they find it, they will know the name Steven Rhodes, through which they can conjure the Threadless marketing site, full of t-shirts, posters, and other products spawned by the same dark-and-twisted sense of humor. This would be a totally inappropriate place to look for Christmas gifts for your friends, so I recommend you stay away from it.

Don’t thank me for that warning. Thank America Needs Fatima.

Early Signs

Can you read this graffiti?
Can you decode this information?
Can you work out what they’re saying to you?
Can you read the signs yet?

Can you feel the real intention?
Can you discern the subtle meaning?
Can you see all the implications?
Can you read the signs yet?

– Shriekback, “Signs” (1992)

This week’s featured post is “Should Democrats Abandon the Trans Community?“.

This week everybody was talking about Matt Gaetz

Thursday, Matt Gaetz withdrew from consideration as attorney general. This is worth celebrating in its own right, but also for a larger reason: It shows that Trump isn’t a dictator yet. Or, as Amanda Marcotte puts it: Resistance is not futile.

The nomination battles are all part of a larger question: Now that the Republicans have a Senate majority — 53-47 after Bob Casey’s concession in Pennsylvania — will the Senate continue to be an independent branch of government? During the Biden administration (or any previous American administration of either party) the answer was obviously Yes. How many times, for example, did Biden have to negotiate with Joe Manchin or Kyrsten Sinema to get some part of his program passed? He couldn’t simply demand that they get into line.

But MAGA is an authoritarian movement with no principles beyond whatever its Leader wants. It dominates the Republican Party, so it’s an open question whether the GOP has also become an authoritarian movement. Many claim that it has, and that if you were elected as a Republican, you were elected to obey Trump. Last week, Texas Congressman Troy Nehls said as much:

If Donald Trump says “jump 3 feet high and scratch your head.” We all jump 3 feet high and scratch our heads.

I can’t picture Joe Manchin doing that for Biden.

Come January, Republicans will control the Senate, so has the Senate also been assimilated into Trump’s authoritarian machine? Trump’s cabinet nominations, the worst of which I discussed last week, have raised that question: If the Leader can make you agree that Matt Gaetz should be the top American law enforcement officer, or approve RFK Jr. as the primary shaper of federal health policy, what can’t he make you do?

For the moment, at least, the answer seems to be that the Senate will retain some limited amount of independence. We got a hint of that on November 13, when the Republican Senate caucus elected John Thune as majority leader, rather than Trump’s choice Rick Scott. The Gaetz withdrawal (in the face of repeated leaks about orgies where underage girls were paid to participate) is a second sign. Trump was apparently unable to make senators repeat Gaetz’s denials and continue supporting him.

Admittedly, that’s a low bar. But it establishes that there IS a limit — something we didn’t know a week ago. What happens to the rest of Trump’s nominees will give us a better idea where that limit is.

The NYT’s Michelle Cottle warns that this is just the beginning:

[Trump’s] M.O. is to relentlessly pressure-test people and institutions. Those who don’t crumble at first are hit again. And again. The goal is to shatter the resisters’ spines, one vertebra at a time if necessary, so that they don’t just bow before him but rather collapse in a gelatinous blob. Like, say, former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

A related point that I hope Republican senators bear in mind: You can never prove your loyalty once and for all. Whatever you offer, he will keep asking for more. If you have any line you won’t cross, he will eventually try to push you past it — and reject you if you hold, as he did with Mike Pence. No VP was ever more loyal than Pence, but it wasn’t enough. There is no “enough”.


Former GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley has no current position and no direct power, but I think it’s meaningful that she criticized both DNI nominee Tulsi Gabbard and HHS nominee RFK Jr. on her radio show. Ultimately, I doubt her resistance will amount to much, but she is demonstrating that Republicans do not automatically have to bend the knee to whatever Trump does.


Trump wasted no time naming a new AG nominee: Pam Bondi. There is things not to like about her as well, but at least she has some qualifications: 20 years as a prosecutor and 8 years as Florida’s attorney general. We can hope she doesn’t have Gaetz-level baggage.

Trump wants his AG is to make the Department of Justice into the partisan weapon he has falsely claimed it was under Biden. (Every DoJ investigation of Trump began with probable cause, and the indictments against him were well supported with evidence. I will have no problems with Bondi investigating or indicting Trump’s rivals or critics if she upholds those standards.) The question to raise with Bondi is how she will respond when her President tweets that so-and-so should be in jail, as he often does.

The signs on this issue are not good. In 2023, Bondi said on Fox News:

At DoJ, the prosecutors will be prosecuted — the bad ones. The investigators will be investigated.

Joyce Vance suggests another question: Did Trump lose the 2020 election?

Unless her answer is yes, the Senate must reject her nomination. You can’t be an election denier & the attorney general.


Trump’s “landslide” win continues to shrink. He got less than half the popular vote.


Trump still hasn’t signed the documents that officially begin the transition process. That would unlock federal funding, allow Biden officials to share sensitive information with their prospective replacements, and let the FBI begin background investigations of Trump’s appointees.

What’s the holdup? Transparency. Trump would have to reveal who’s been funding his transition efforts to date, and would open his incoming administration to conflict-of-interest considerations.


The night before Gaetz withdrew, a panel on MSNBC’s “The 11th Hour” discussed the most recent sexual revelations and how Gaetz’s nomination probably wasn’t tenable any more. One panelist said, “I do agree. He will probably have to pull out. Excuse me, that’s a bad choice of words.”

The panel erupted into laughter and host Stephanie Ruhle quickly went to commercial.

and whether Democrats should abandon the trans community

That’s covered in the featured post. Spoiler: I think not.

and Netanyahu’s indictment

From Vox:

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has formally issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif for war crimes and crimes against humanity. … The warrants accuse Gallant and Netanyahu of violating the laws of international armed conflict by intentionally depriving civilians in Gaza of “food, water, and medicine and medical supplies, as well as fuel and electricity” by consistently blocking humanitarian aid into Gaza. They also accuse both men of intentionally directing attacks against civilians in Gaza in at least two instances. Deif is also accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity including murder, torture, and sexual violence.

Naturally, Israel is not going to turn its own government officials over to the ICC for trial, and Deif may not even be alive. So the immediate effect is more of a nuisance than a threat: Any time he wants to travel outside Israel, Netanyahu will have to make sure that the countries he passes through aren’t planning to arrest him. 124 countries are treaty-bound to arrest him, though some have announced they won’t. The US has never officially recognized the ICC, and President Biden has called the indictment “outrageous”, so Netanyahu should be safe to come here. (If his plane has to make an emergency landing in the EU or Canada, though, there could be a problem.)

The warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant could also complicate weapons transfers from European states and nations with laws limiting transfers in situations in which there’s credible reason to believe a country will use them to commit atrocities.

“We’ve already seen a Dutch court saying that the Netherlands cannot send fighter jet [parts], for example, to Israel. We’ve seen the termination or expiration of various arms contracts that the UK had,” said Kelebogile Zvobgo, professor of government at the College of William & Mary.

and the federal budget

Elon Musk’s DOGE is about to barrage us with disinformation about federal spending. Paul Krugman pre-bunks a bunch of it with the following graph, showing that federal employment has not significantly increased since the 1950s. (Those little blips at 10-year-intervals must be census employees.)

Don Moynihan covers some of the same information, and notes that the entire federal civilian payroll is about $271 billion per year. So firing all of them would be just a drop in the bucket on the way to the $2 trillion annual savings Musk is promising. Moynihan then explains what the government does spend money on.

Where do you think Musk can find his $2 trillion, if not in Social Security, Medicare, defense, and interest we owe on existing debt?


Elon has started identifying individual government workers for harassment.


We’re also going to be hearing a lot of nonsense about taxes in the coming months, as Congress deals with the expiration of the tax cuts from Trump’s first term. Here’s some nonsense Don Jr. retweeted:

Replace the US tax code’s 7000 pages and millions of word with a simple flat tax. It could fit into a few pages of simple English, making paying taxes simple and enforcement even simpler.

I’m guessing that neither Don Jr. nor the guy who originally posted this have ever done their own taxes. If they had, they would know that progressive tax rates add almost no complexity to the process, so making everybody pay the same rate would not simplify anything. What’s complicated is defining income. Once you’ve determined your taxable income, you just look up your tax on a table.

What makes defining income so tricky? Rich people like the Trumps who hire smart accountants to seek out every possible trick for hiding income. If everybody could be trusted to report their income fairly and accurately, the tax code could indeed be much shorter and simpler.

Bottom line: Flat taxes are not simpler. Period. All they do is shift the tax burden from the rich to everybody else.

If anybody honestly wants to make taxes simpler, I have a suggestion: treat dividends and capital gains the same as wages. If all forms of income were equal, I wouldn’t have to fill out the Dividend and Capital Gain worksheet, which is one of the most annoying parts of filing my taxes, and where I’m most likely to make mistakes. But of course, that change would hurt the rich rather than help them, so it will never go anywhere.

and long-term Democratic strategy

If you’ve gotten tired of hearing about how you need to work harder to understand and empathize with Trump voters, I have a conversation for you: David Roberts interviewing Dan Savage on his Volts blog.

At first glance, they seem like an unlikely pair to discuss long-term Democratic strategy: Volts mostly focuses on sustainable power and electrification, and if you have heard of Savage, you probably probably associate him with LGBTQ issues. But Roberts has Savage on to discuss “The Urban Archipelago“, an article Savage was responsible for when he was an editor at Seattle’s weekly alternative newspaper The Stranger two decades ago. (The current Democratic mood is remarkably similar to the post-2004 election mood, a comparison that also comes up in the featured post.)

It’s time to state something that we’ve felt for a long time but have been too polite to say out loud: Liberals, progressives, and Democrats do not live in a country that stretches from the Atlantic to the Pacific, from Canada to Mexico. We live on a chain of islands. We are citizens of the Urban Archipelago, the United Cities of America.

Republicans have long celebrated their identification with rural and small-town America (which Sarah Palin dubbed “real America“), and they openly run against America’s cities — not just Washington DC, but against all the cities. Democrats, by contrast, have never embraced their urban identity, or made the case that “San Francisco values” are admirable values. “The Urban Archipelago” claimed that they should.

[T]he challenge for the Democrats is not just to organize in the blue areas but to grow them. And to do that, Democrats need to pursue policies that encourage urban growth (mass transit, affordable housing, city services), and Democrats need to openly and aggressively champion urban values. By focusing on the cities the Dems can create a tribal identity to combat the white, Christian, rural, and suburban identity that the Republicans have cornered.

The Stranger apparently was (and maybe still is) one of those in-your-face alternative papers, so the article contains a lot of statements like:

To red-state voters, to the rural voters, residents of small, dying towns, and soulless sprawling exburbs, we say this: Fuck off. Your issues are no longer our issues. We’re going to battle our bleeding-heart instincts and ignore pangs of misplaced empathy.

It’s a little bit different from all those we-must-try-harder-to-understand-Trump-voters articles. This is much more like: If the morons in West Virginia want to let mining companies turn their state into a polluted wasteland, let them. If they want to rebel against vax mandates by letting their kids get polio, let them. It’s not our problem.

So Roberts and Savage look at the last 20 years and lament the missed opportunities. In particular, they lament the unwillingness of Democratic governments at the state and local level to build dense housing or expand mass transit into the suburbs and exurbs, with the result that city living has become prohibitively expensive, especially for the working class. NIMBYism among single-family homeowners combined with anti-gentrification and anti-growth sentiment among urban progressives has prevented the creation of the dense, liveable neighborhoods you can find in European cities like Hamburg or Berlin.

(Roberts and Savage make a simple observation: If rich people want to move into Seattle or Nashville, they will. And if new housing isn’t being built, they’ll outbid the lower classes for the housing available.)

By limiting the opportunity to live in cities, Democrats have failed to promote the lessons that come from urban life: that it’s not enough to be a rugged individual, that you have to tolerate and work together with people different from you, and that immigrants and Muslims and transfolk aren’t demons, they’re people you see every day on the subway.

One line to remember from this conversation: For Democrats, city building is party building.

and you also might be interested in …

“I want to be in the moment, just not this moment.”

DoJ has proposed its remedies in response to a court decision last August that Google had an illegal monopoly on internet search.

The proposals filed to a Washington federal court include the forced sale of the Chrome browser and a five-year ban from entering the browser market; a block on paying third parties such as Apple to make Google the default search engine on their products; and divestment of the Android mobile operating system if the initial proposals do not work.

I believe this case was undertaken in good faith, but you don’t have to be Nostradamus to see where things go from here: Google will adjust its algorithms to favor Trump, and the case will be dropped.


Remember during the campaign when Trump denied that he had anything to do with Project 2025? He just nominated the head of Project 2025 to be his budget director.


Republicans are already feeling better about the state of the economy. By Inauguration Day, they’ll be back to saying it’s “the best economy ever”, even if nothing actually changes.


Brazil’s former president Jair Bolsonaro has been indicted for plotting a coup after he lost the 2022 election. Now we’ll get to see how another democracy handles this problem.


Louisiana Republicans have just shifted their tax burden downward: They cut personal and corporate income taxes, and “balanced” it with an increase in the state sales tax, which even the poorest people end up paying.


The BlueSky migration continues. Here’s an article by somebody who understands the details better than I do.


The season of humility begins: The Washington Post has published its list of 50 notable fiction and nonfiction books of 2024. Illiterate schlub that I am, I have read none of them.


How bad has the UK been governed since 2008? This bad.


61 years ago yesterday, it was Sunday afternoon and I was 7 years old. My grandfather had recently died, so the grownups were in my grandmother’s kitchen, probably trying to work out what she should do next. I was considered too young to be in that conversation, so they parked me in her living room in front of the TV.

That’s how I watched Jack Ruby kill Lee Harvey Oswald — live, as it was happening. I ran out into the kitchen telling people that somebody had just shot Oswald. The grownups patiently explained to me that nobody had shot Oswald, Oswald had shot Kennedy. Then they sent me back out to the living room to face reality by myself.

This was one of my formative experiences as a journalist.

and let’s close with something a little too accurate

From The New Yorker:

“The pit of despair. That’s new, isn’t it?”

Sorrowful Arrivals

Sorrow is better than fear. Fear is a journey, a terrible journey, but sorrow is at least an arrival. When the storm threatens, a man is afraid for his house. But when the house is destroyed, there is something to do. About a storm he can do nothing, but he can rebuild a house.

Alan Paton Cry, the Beloved Country  

This week’s featured post is “My Way-Too-Soon Election Response“.

This week it was hard to think about anything beyond the election

That’s the subject of the featured post. Long as that post is, there’s a lot I didn’t get to.

In general, I am avoiding articles that predict the electorate will now get what it deserves. They’re emotionally satisfying, but I don’t think they lead anywhere good. However, I can’t resist sharing this H. L. Mencken quote:

Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.


The stock market seems to be anticipating corruption, as well-connected companies saw their stocks soar after the election. The American Prospect runs through a list of big gainers, including the cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase and installment lender MoneyLion, which the Biden administration has accused of overcharging members of the military.

Another big winner: Elon Musk, whose net worth has now exceeded $300 billion. On the surface this makes no sense, because Trump has been an outspoken critic of electric cars like the ones Musk’s Tesla makes. But if Trump surrounds himself with oligarchs like Putin has, Musk will be one of the most prominent.

BTW, I would be wary of investing in Tesla. If Musk decides to screw the minority shareholders, will the Trump Justice Department protect them? This question illustrates one of the problems of shifting from a rule-of-law government to an authoritarian government: Everything becomes less trustworthy, so the machinery of economics gets creeky and slow.


Another person apparently slated for a high position in the new administration — like maybe Secretary of Health and Human Services — is RFK Jr., who has no healthcare credentials and a history of promoting conspiracy theories about vaccines.


One of the first things to watch is how quickly Trump’s mass deportation plans come together, and what (if anything) can be done to slow them down. In his first administration, he moved quickly to implement his Muslim ban, which met a lot of resistance and eventually was significantly delayed/altered by the courts.

but there’s still a world out there somewhere

Meanwhile, Germany’s ruling coalition has dissolved, leaving the current chancellor without a majority in the Bundestag. Expect a no-confidence vote in January and elections in March.

Germany’s economy has stagnated since Covid, producing all sorts of internal tensions. (Germany is one of the countries that would love to have the “bad” Biden economy.) In recent years the neo-fascist Alliance for Germany (AfD) Party has been gaining. Whether they can win the March elections is the next political disaster to worry about.


I’m not sure which narrative of the recent violence in Amsterdam to trust. It followed a Netherlands/Israel soccer game. In some accounts the violence was a pure antisemitic eruption. In others, obnoxious fans on both sides exchanged provocations until fighting broke out.

and you also might be interested in …

Pope Francis recently started using #Saints in his tweets, not realizing that it refers to the New Orleans Saints football team. The team’s X account thanked the Pope for his prayers and replied, “We need them.”

The Saints are having a slow start to the season, and were sitting in fourth, and last, place in the NFC South. A significant number of injuries have struck among wide receivers and the offensive line, and last week head coach Dennis Allen was fired. But there are signs the Pope’s prayers could be working: on Sunday the Saints won for the first time since September, holding on for a narrow win over the Atlanta Falcons.

and let’s close with some monkey business

Wednesday, 43 lab monkeys made a break for it after an employee at Alpha Genesis Primate Research Center in Yemasee, South Carolina left a door open. As of Sunday, 25 of the rhesus macaques had been recovered. Most of the rest seemed to be in the trees surrounding the lab complex, and occasionally jump back over the fence to interact with their caged compatriots. Police have warned people living nearby to keep their doors and windows locked.

News articles have been vague about what experiments the monkeys are part of, saying only that they “hadn’t been tested yet”, and so there was no public health threat. CBS reports:

According to its website, Alpha Gensis breeds monkeys and provides “nonhuman primate products and bio-research services” across the globe. The company’s clinical trials reportedly include research on progressive brain disorders. … The Post and Courier newspaper reported last year that Alpha Genesis won a federal contract to oversee a colony of 3,500 rhesus monkeys on South Carolina’s Morgan Island, known as “Monkey Island.”

Monkeys are uniquely valuable in medical research because they are so similar to humans. But that similarity also makes the cruelty of medical research uniquely horrible.

The Alpha Genesis CEO painted an amusing picture of the escape:

It’s really like follow-the-leader. You see one go and the others go. It was a group of 50 and 7 stayed behind and 43 bolted out the door.

I find myself rooting for the monkeys to stay free as long as possible. I occasionally vacation down the road on Hilton Head Island. The next time I do I’ll be looking closely up into the trees.

Sufficiency

Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

Matthew 6:34

I haven’t checked, but this may be the shortest Weekly Sift ever. Here’s why: Given how close and how consequential tomorrow’s election looks, it’s hard to think about anything else. And yet, it’s also hard to come up with anything worthwhile to say about it. I could try to predict who’s going to win, but you’d be foolish to believe me, because I don’t know. I could collect a lot of other people’s predictions, but they don’t know either.

We’re down to the point where you can vote, you can encourage your friends to vote, and you can do some election-day volunteering. Beyond that, you can watch the Future arrive at the usual rate of one second per second.

Back in 2008, I started doing election preview posts, predicting how the evening was likely to play out, given poll-closing times and what the opinion polls were saying. The 2008 preview was so accurate that I started thinking I knew something. (I said that California’s outcome would be projected almost immediately after polls closed at 11 EST, putting Obama over the top. That’s exactly what happened.) I got 2016 drastically wrong, but I didn’t learn my lesson and wrote a 2020 preview anyway.

This year has been an ongoing master class in the pointlessness of speculation. Pundits have talked and written endlessly about how the debates would go, whether Biden would or should drop out, what process the Democrats should use to replace him, whether Harris would do any better, who the two VP nominees should be, whether Trump’s endless gaffes would cost him, what the “October surprise” might be, how various voting blocs — women, Blacks, Hispanics, union members — would respond to Harris, and on and on.

If you ignored all of it, you are probably better off than the rest of us, or at least calmer. By tomorrow, we will all have voted, contributed, volunteered — or not. What has mattered is action, not divining the future.

Here’s what I will say: In a typical election, late-deciding voters mostly break the same way. So for better or worse, there’s a good chance we won’t have the kind of photo-finish the polls are predicting.

If this were a typical election, it would be obvious that Trump is blowing it down the stretch: the Puerto Rico insult (and his unwillingness to distance himself from it), simulating oral sex with a microphone, fantasizing about pointing guns at Liz Cheney, and so on. Despite major media continuing to sanewash Trump — CNN posted video of the oral-sex pantomime with the caption “At a rally in Milwaukee, former President Donald Trump became visibly frustrated after dealing with technical problems on stage.” You’d never know he raged for over three minutes about problems any other speaker would shrug off, and then made an inappropriate sexual gesture — the man’s hateful and unhinged nature has been on full display for anyone who cares to look.

But as we all know by now, this isn’t a typical election. No one knows what the late-deciders are thinking. We’ll just have to wait and see.

There are any number of other things you could choose to worry about. But there will be plenty of time to start worrying about them after Wednesday or so.

For example: Trump seems to be gearing up once again to claim power even if the voters reject him. He and Speaker Johnson have some “secret plan”. Elie Mystal has a guess about what it might be. And who knows what the Supreme Court will do? Will they let him lose? Every time the Court has had a question put to it, it has ruled for Trump, often in complete opposition to precedent or even written law. How far will it go? I don’t know and neither does anybody else who isn’t on the Court. But unless you’re on the Harris legal team, you can procrastinate on that bit of worrying until the post-election legal battles actually start — which they won’t if Trump wins legitimately (because Democrats respect the voters’ right to reject them).

If Trump wins and begins assembling a fascist administration, that also would be worth worrying about, and even moreso if Republicans get control one or more houses of the new Congress. But worrying about it now won’t give you any special advantage.

As for the next two days: I voted early and I sent Harris a check months ago. I’ve been trying to make the case for her and against him for months. Now all I can do is watch and wait — and try not to obsess about things that may or may not happen.

If you’re trying to convince some last-minute deciders to vote for Harris, here’s some material to work with.

The NYT writes one paragraph that sums up why you shouldn’t vote for Trump, and backs up each statement with a link to a longer article. Matt Yglesias writes a positive case for Harris, which isn’t flashy because it centers on “normal” things like integrity, the rule of law, and taking a pragmatic approach to helping ordinary people solve typical problems like how to afford a house or send their kids to college.

If you’re talking to someone who thinks voting for Trump is the “Christian” position, point them to this guy.

If you’re talking to a progressive who won’t vote for Harris because of Gaza, show them this.

One final thing: As I explained at some length in August, if you think you’re nostalgic for the “Trump economy”, what you’re actually nostalgic for is the pre-Covid economy, when a lot of things were cheaper. But electing Trump won’t bring those days back.

Around the world, governments took very similar actions to keep their economies going while fighting Covid. And around the world, those actions eventually led to inflation; it’s not a Biden/Harris thing. Our inflation happened to show up after Trump left office (because that’s when the new vaccines allowed the economy to reopen) but his actions had as much to do with it as Biden’s. Once you recognize the hit Covid was on the economy — and would have been even if Trump had been reelected in 2020 — you can appreciate how well the Biden/Harris administration has managed the recovery from Covid.

Here’s a metaphor that might help: Think about how you might feel as you leave the hospital after being treated for a heart attack. Do you feel as carefree and vibrant as you did before the heart attack? Probably not. But you also feel a heck of a lot better than you did when you arrived in the ER, and you should appreciate what the doctors did to pull you through.

Trump is selling nostalgia for 2019, before Covid did its damage. But on that day in 2021 when Biden was inaugurated, the “Trump economy” was a mess. It’s much better now.

Fragile, not Perishable

But to be fragile is not the same as to be perishable, as G.K. Chesterton wrote. Simply do not break a glass, and it will last a thousand years. Smash it, and it will not last an instant. Democracy is like that: fragile, but only if you shatter it.

Alexandra Petri

This week’s featured posts are “MAGA’s Closing Argument: Dad’s Coming Home” and “Democracy Succumbs in Silence“.

This week everybody was talking about the campaign

One featured post tries to explain what Trump supporters could possibly be thinking.


I’m still doing my best to ignore polls and pundits’ speculations about who will win. I gather than the race still considered close, which is all I really need to know at this point. For what it’s worth, I will toss in my own speculation: Some last-minute shift will make the result more decisive than it looks now. I can’t say which way the shift will go, but I don’t think we’ll be waiting all week to find out who won.


Remember when it would have been an earthshaking October surprise if a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model accused a candidate of groping her to impress Jeffrey Epstein? Well, never mind.

A Trump campaign spokesman repeated its standard excuse, that the model is a partisan Democrat. After all, she gave $25 to Biden’s 2020 campaign. I’m always amazed anyone takes such claims seriously. I mean, maybe she’s accusing Trump of groping her because she supports his opponents. But isn’t it more likely that she supports his opponents because he groped her?


Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally yesterday is being widely described as a hate-fest. I haven’t had time to digest it all, but apparently warm-up comedian Tony Hinchcliffe thought it would be funny to describe Puerto Rico as “a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean“. Several people have pointed out that Hinchcliffe was using a teleprompter, so the Trump campaign had seen what he would say and presumably approved it.

From the same rally, Tim Miller posts an ironic picture of Elon Musk and Melania Trump — both immigrants — with the Stephen Miller quote “America is for Americans, and Americans only.”


The Democrats’ most powerful speaker continues to be Michelle Obama. In Kalamazoo Saturday, she laid out the extensive consequences for women’s health caused by the abortion bans that followed the Dobbs’ decision, and how Trump could extend many of these consequences to the entire country. She also pleaded with “the men who love us” to understand how their own lives could be affected.

If your wife is shivering and bleeding on the operating table during a routine delivery gone bad, her pressure dropping as she loses more and more blood or some unforeseen infection spreads, and her doctors aren’t sure if they can act, you will be the one praying that it’s not too late. You will be the one pleading for somebody, anybody, to do something.


I had planned to do an article collecting all the former Trump allies who have told us he should never wield power again, but the NYT did it for me.

The standard Trump defense (you can see Vance give it here) is that these are all disgruntled people Trump fired. But usually the cause-and-effect ran in the other direction: Attorney General Bill Barr and cybersecurity czar Chris Krebs were fired because they disputed Trump’s stolen-election lies. Mike Pence is out with Trump because he wouldn’t violate the Constitution for him.

The typical order things happen is: Somebody in TrumpWorld can no longer tolerate the illegal or unethical things they’re being asked to do. Then Trump fires them or otherwise forces them out. They’re fired for disloyalty, not incompetence.


The Lincoln Project has translated a number of Trump remarks into German and illustrated them with video from the 1930s. It fits perfectly.


Not to be missed is this Jon Stewart rant about the excuses Republicans make for Trump’s fascist rhetoric about “the enemy within”, and how major media lets them get away with it.


Grist analyzes the climate and environmental significance of a vote for either Harris or Trump.


In Georgia Wednesday, talking about his plans for mass deportation, Trump gave us some more insight into the “again” in “Make American Great Again”. He said:

We had to go back to 1798. That’s when we had laws that were effective.

I don’t know if they still teach this in US History classes, but the 1798 laws he’s talking about are the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were a low point in US civil liberties.

As the Adams administration’s relationship with France deteriorated, Federalists became increasingly worried about immigrants who might have French sympathies. So Congress passed a series of laws that together became known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. One of the Acts was the Alien Friends Act, which gave the president power to deport any non-citizen he considered dangerous.

Another, the Sedition Act, made it a crime for American citizens to “print, utter, or publish…any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government.

Adams was pressured to invoke the AFA against Joseph Priestley, the chemist who isolated oxygen and figured out how to make carbonated water. Priestley had been chased out of England for his sympathy with the French Revolution, and then resettled in Pennsylvania. In many ways Priestley was precisely the kind of person the AFA targeted, but Adams resisted invoking it, citing Priestley’s age and fragility.

It’s impossible to say exactly how intimidated Priestley felt, but after Jefferson (a friend of Priestley and an opponent of the Acts) was elected in 1800, Priestley wrote: “It is only now that I can say I see nothing to fear from the hand of power”.

During the Jefferson administration, some the Acts expired and the others were explicitly repealed. Trump may remember those laws fondly, but he can’t legally invoke them.

and newspaper non-endorsements

The billionaire owners of the Washington Post and LA Times stepped in to prevent their papers from endorsing Kamala Harris. One featured post explains why this “obeying in advance” is a disturbing sign for American democracy.

and you also might be interested in …

A correction from last week:

When talking about how the Steward chain of hospitals went bankrupt, I said that the private equity firm Cerberus (who owned the hospitals) created Medical Properties Trust to sell the hospital’s land to.

The sources I link to don’t actually say that. I extrapolated from the degree of collusion the two firms displayed to conclude that they were two tentacles of the same octopus. But it seems not to be true.


In the blog The Big Picture, David Pepper describes how Ohio broke its public school system. Once ranked fifth among the state systems, it’s now somewhere in the 20s and dropping, after money was siphoned off for charter schools and private school vouchers.


The Tennessee Holler writes about the 400 books Wilson County is removing from school libraries, in accordance with a recent state law.

As I study the list, the fantasy section of the high school libraries seems especially hard hit: George Martin, Sarah Maas, Diana Gabaldon, Margaret Atwood …



Jesse Kelly:

For those who aren’t old enough, you cannot imagine how little race tension there was in this country before Obama got into power

This sentiment is surprisingly widespread among White conservatives, and it even becomes true with a small substitution: Replace “little race tension there was in this country” with “comfortable White people were in their privilege”. My rewrite:

For those who aren’t old enough, you cannot imagine how comfortable White people were in their privilege before Obama got into power.

In my view, the increased race tension of the current era comes almost entirely from Whites freaking out about a Black man gaining power.

and let’s close with something slimy

When I closed last week with a microscope enlargement of sugar from a Coke, I didn’t realize that Nikon runs an annual Small World contest for similar photos. So this week I learned that slime mold can be unexpectedly interesting if you enlarge it enough.

Waiting

Good news will wait, and bad news will refuse to leave.

– Tevye, Fiddler on the Roof

This week’s featured posts are “Mifepristone, round 2” and “Trump’s Weird Week“.

This week I refused to pay attention to polls and speculation

I can’t help learning from headlines that the race is still close, and how much more do I need to know? I know who I’m voting for, and I’ve already written my check to the Harris campaign. I could spend all day fretting about whether the likelihood of Harris winning is 55% or 45%, but what’s the point?

Here’s something I learned years and years ago when my wife was being treated for breast cancer: For the first month or two, I combed through all the statistics I could find, trying to find the numbers that fit her exact situation. Eventually, though, it dawned on me that survival and death were both possibilities too likely to ignore. No matter what study I found next, I wasn’t going to be able to tell myself “That’s not going to happen”, and we would also have to keep making long-range plans for our life together. (She lived, and those plans have served us well.)

That was as much as the statistics could tell me, and trying to get a more precise answer out of them was pointless.

Same thing here. On this Election Night “the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat” (to use the old Wide World of Sports tagline) will both be legitimate possibilities. You’re going to have to prepare yourself emotionally to face either one. No poll or expert analysis is going to tell you anything more than that.

but I couldn’t help noticing Trump’s weird week

One featured post covers this point, but a few noteworthy odds and ends got left out, like this photo of a Trump makeup fail.

Sure, the photo makes Trump look ridiculous, but that’s not why I call it to your attention. It’s also evidence of a more serious problem: He’s surrounded by people who are afraid to tell him he looks ridiculous. That’s why the prospect of his second term is scarier than his first term was: In his first term, he was hemmed in by people — Don McGahn, John Kelly, Jeff Sessions, etc. — who would tell him that what he wanted to do was illegal. Those people are gone now, and they’ve been replaced by yes-men.


My article also overlooked the fact that the mainstream press (like the NYT, the Boston Globe, and AP) is finally beginning to cover Trump’s deterioration, after obsessing endlessly about Biden’s age issues.


Dave Bautista, former pro wrestler and Marvel’s Drax the Destroyer, gets real about “tough guy” Donald Trump. There’s not a joke in here anywhere, but it’s funny because it’s true.

and Elon’s campaign shenanigans

In the 2020 cycle, Trump and his people told bald-faced lies about Dominion voting machines stealing his votes. The lies were so transparent that Fox News had to pay $787 million to Dominion to settle a defamation suit. (Think about that: Defamation suits are hard to win, especially against news organizations, especially big ones who can afford the best lawyers. Trump threatens to sue news organizations all the time, but he hasn’t collected a dime.)

But why not do it again? Both MTG and Elon were out spreading crap about Dominion this week, and the MAGA sheep are probably swallowing it. You know who’s also doing it: Rasmussen Reports, a supposedly neutral polling organization whose polls always wind up favoring Trump — and get included in many polling averages as if they were legit.


Elon’s money is funding a lot of shady election tactics. Chris Hayes reports on how Muslim voters in Michigan are being micro-targeted with borderline antisemitic ads saying that Harris is all-in for Israel because she is controlled by her Jewish husband, while Jewish voters in Michigan are being micro-targeted with ads saying that Harris “panders to Palestine”. The ads are all from the same group.

Another Elon project is the fake pro-Harris “Progress 2028”.

They have set up fake sites impersonating the Harris campaign using fake policy positions and then sending out text messages also impersonating the campaign which aim to drive voters to the fake site.

Josh Marshall thinks the fake web site is probably legal, but the texts might not be. Matt Yglesias makes a good point:

It tells you something that they literally made up from scratch a fake version of Kamala Harris to run against.

This should be a bigger story: The richest guy in the world, who could make billions more from the right government contracts, is funding ethically dubious projects to get a fellow billionaire into the White House. Working-class voters who believe Trump is their champion might want to think about that.

and mifepristone, round 2

When the Supreme Court tossed an anti-mifepristone lawsuit on technical grounds, you knew that couldn’t be the end of the story. The other featured post details some of the creepy ideas the new lawsuit raises, like states being upset that their teen birthrate is too low. (When I saw that claim on social media, I didn’t believe it. So I read the 199-page lawsuit and discovered that it’s true.)

and here’s another story that deserves more attention

Capitalism does some things well, but it should be kept far away from other things, like running hospitals.

Thursday, the WaPo published a column summarizing a report Senator Ed Markey put out in September about the collapse of the Steward Health Care hospital chain.

The 34-hospital chain was formed in 2010 by a private equity group, Cerberus, which acquired the hospitals as investments. The WaPo article gives the firm credit for initially having benign intentions: ObamaCare had just passed, so maybe there would be a surge of new patients able to afford health care. Running the hospitals as hospitals looked likely to be a money-maker for Cerberus.

For various reasons that turned out not to be the case. But Cerberus had to produce profits for its investors anyway, so it turned to financial engineering. It formed a real estate investment trust, Medical Properties Trust, which bought the land under Steward hospitals and leased it back to the hospitals. Rather than simply owning the land, the hospitals now had to rent it, increasing annual costs. But the transaction created both a pile of money that Steward could distribute to Cerberus shareholders, as well as a regular income stream Cerberus could collect through MPT.

The downside of this transaction was diminishing the underlying viability of the hospitals, which now struggled to cover their increased costs. In May, the chain declared bankruptcy, and state governments are now spending many millions to keep at-risk communities from losing their hospitals.

In total, Cerberus has said it made roughly $800 million on its investment in Steward, more than tripling its original investment, even as the hospitals themselves were hemorrhaging cash.

As best I can tell, none of this is illegal. It’s just one more example of capitalists taking risks where the profits will be private but the losses can be socialized.

Similar stories can be told about private equity’s role in the destruction of America’s newspapers, especially local ones: Take over a challenged but surviving paper, borrow massively against its assets to pay inflated “management fees” to the investment company, then declare bankruptcy. It’s a slow-motion version of what Tony’s mob does to a local business in the “Bust Out” episode of The Sopranos.


In mythology, Cerberus is the name of Hades’ three-headed dog, who guards the gate to the Land of the Dead. It’s a rather macabre name for a firm that owns hospitals.

and you also might be interested in …

From the UK, The Economist notices something a lot of American media misses: The US economy is “The Envy of the World“.


Israel announced the death of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, the likely mastermind behind the October 7 attacks. Under a different administration, Israel might use this event to declare victory and start moving towards peace.


Maybe you don’t have the time to read the full 900-page Project 2025 plan. But how about a few comics explaining the worst of it?

And if you want to understand the related movement of White Christian Nationalism, Kat Abu has an hour-long video explaining it.


Doug Balloon puts aside his satirical NYT Pitchbot persona to opine about WHY the NYT has covered the campaign as badly as it has, and in particular why it has consistently sanewashed Trump. He decides against any cynical argument about financial advantage and instead attributes the Times’ behavior to simple incompetence and laziness: “their system isn’t built to deal with a narcissistic sociopath” and they don’t want to change. The company is run by a “nepo baby” who is the son of a nepo baby, and he has hired high-level people who aren’t very good at their jobs.

Not to say there aren’t lots and lots of great journalists and editors at the Times. It pays well and it’s tough to get good jobs in journalism, so they can certainly hire lots of great people. But I suspect that on the really big decisions, ones where Sulzberger himself or people near him weigh in, the fact neither Sulzberger or the people near him are very smart or competent plays a big role.


A commenter recently pointed me to this Lancet article, claiming that the actual number of deaths caused by the war in Gaza is probably much higher than the official estimate. Wars, the article points out, commonly produce “indirect deaths” well beyond the number of people who directly die by violence. These deaths are from disease, malnutrition, and various other causes, and they may occur even after the violence ends. Looking at past conflicts, the article claims the total death toll could be between 3 and 15 times the official count of around 42,000.


I always come back from a driving trip with a new podcast to recommend. This time I listened to Trevor Noah’s “What Now?”. In particular, Noah’s interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates is amazing. In the final essay in his new book The Message, Coates compared the Israeli occupation of the West Bank to South Africa’s apartheid. Noah grew up in South Africa, and was 10 when apartheid ended. They have a lot of interesting things to say.

and let’s close with something tiny

Ever since Anton van Leeuwenhoek began to popularize the microscope in the early 1600s, people have been amazed by what ordinary objects look like under extreme magnification. In this article Scientist assembles beautiful and surprising images of extremely small things, like this close-up of a sugar found in Coca-Cola.

Tactics and Strategy

No Sift next week. The next new articles will appear on October 21.

It’s a tactical success, but what is the strategy?

– Randa Slim on Israel’s war against Hamas and Hezbollah,
quoted by Nicholas Kristof

This week’s featured post is “One year later“.

This week everybody should have been talking about good economic news

The pandemic laid a one-two punch on the world economy. First came the job losses, and then an inflation spike associated with reopening the economy. Those same two phenomena happened all over the world, which is why (as I often point out) it’s a mistake to blame either Trump for the job losses or Biden for the inflation.

Sadly, though, most Americans understand only half of that truth: They give Trump a mulligan for his job losses while blaming Biden for inflation. In the public mind, the “Trump economy” is the pre-Covid 2019 economy, while Biden is held responsible for everything that has happened since.

What is remarkable, though, is how fast the US economy has bounced back, and the Biden administration deserves a lot of credit for that. In 2023, inflation-adjusted household income very nearly regained its 2019 high, and may well be at record levels by now. I have had trouble finding apples-to-apples statistics from other countries, but I believe no comparable nation has done as well with the Covid one-two punch as the US has.

This week we got more evidence for this view: The September jobs report came out showing a very strong economy: 254K new jobs were added (about 100K beyond economists’ expectations) and the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1%.

Other good news: The East Coast dockworkers strike was suspended, preventing a major disruption of the economy just weeks before the election. (The work stoppage we did see is comparable to a spate of bad weather.) The shipping companies made a new offer, which was close enough to what unions are looking for to continue negotiations through January 15.

and the anniversary of October 7

This is covered in the featured post.

By coincidence, this week was also marked by the publication of a new book, The Message, by Ta-Nehisi Coates, who is the foremost Black public intellectual, and possibly the most significant American public intellectual. The final chapter of the book discusses his trip to the West Bank. (I haven’t read the whole book, but I have read that chapter.)

The controversy this chapter has raised underlines a point I made in the featured post: how hard it is to have a reasonable discussion of Israel/Palestine. A broad theme of The Message is how writers shape the world by deciding whose stories get told. People whose stories aren’t told don’t get fully envisioned as human beings.

Coates sees the Palestinians as such people, and tries to counteract their less-than status by telling some of their stories. He notes that no news organization he is aware of has a Palestinian bureau chief in Jerusalem. When Palestine is discussed in American media, Palestinian voices are usually not included. (I’m guilty of this myself. Even when I criticize Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, I am usually linking to liberal American Jews like Peter Beinart.)

In some circles Coates has been met with vitriol, and broad implications that he is antisemitic. One CBS interviewer in particular went after him for not including more Israeli points of view. (He does talk to ex-IDF Israelis sympathetic to the Palestinian situation.) Coates kept his cool and explained that Israeli points of view are already widely available in American media.

Coates has also faced criticism for not being a Middle Eastern expert and missing the complexity of the situation. If I might put words in Coates’ mouth, he seems to be saying that solutions may be complicated, but certain basic moral judgments are simple.

The book makes many analogies between the Palestinian apartheid and slavery/Jim Crow in the US, so I’ll make another one: Before the Civil War, many Northerners toured the South and came back to denounce slavery. Universally, Southerners responded the way many have responded to Coates: They said the Northerners didn’t understand the complexities of the situation. How would a post-slavery Southern economy work? How would the races coexist? It was complicated.

But you didn’t need answers to those questions to look at the immediate reality of slavery and say “This is wrong.” That’s what Coates does. He wanders through neighborhoods of the West Bank, sees how people are treated, and says “This is wrong.”

and Jack Smith’s evidence

The Supreme Court has done a lot to help Trump get away with his January 6 coup. They sat on their hands to delay their decision as long as possible, and then invented a notion of “presidential immunity” that no lower court had any notion of. It’s not in the Constitution and there’s no indication that any pre-Trump administration believed it had such immunity.

As a result, Trump’s trial has been pushed past the election, and may not happen at all. This means that voters will have to decide the 2024 election without knowing precisely how Trump tried to invalidate the 2020 election. January 6 has become a he-said/she-said event, rather than the subject of a jury verdict.

But part of the delay is that the district court has to determine what charges and what evidence can survive the Supreme Court’s ruling. So Jack Smith assembled a 165-page brief describing the evidence he wants to present at trial and why he thinks it should not be subject to presidential immunity. This is as much of the evidence against Trump as the public is going to see before the election.

Just Security has posted an annotated version of Smith’s brief that re-enters nearly all the redacted names. In general, we got new details of the evidence, but the basic story remains the same.

As usual, Trump has had nothing specific to say about the evidence presented in the filing, but only assailed it in general as “election interference” and a “witch hunt”. In response, two facts are worth pointing out:

  • Very little of the evidence the special counsel has collected comes from Democrats or never-Trump Republicans. Nearly all of it references grand jury testimony under oath by Republicans who supported the Trump campaign through Election Day. (A few, like Bill Barr, only broke with him after he started lying about his electoral defeat.)
  • The brief is appearing now, just before the election, because Trump has pursued every opportunity for delay, and the Republicans on the Supreme Court have aided and abetted him at every turn. Otherwise, this trial would have been over by now. If he really were innocent — which he isn’t — Trump could have cleared his name long before the election.

and the VP debate

Last week I said that VP debates seldom move the needle in an election, and I think that held true for the Walz/Vance debate. [video, transcript]

Debates always have two impacts: in the moment and over time. People who watched the debate live tended to see Vance as the smoother debater who had fewer awkward moments. But the lasting impressions favor Walz: He confronted Vance directly on the question of who won the 2020 election, which Vance could not bring himself to answer. And Vance’s objection to being fact-checked crystallized his ticket’s approach, which is to get away with saying whatever they can, without regard to truth. Going forward, both clips provide fodder for Harris/Walz attack ads.

Vance’s nonanswer underlines something more general and ominous: The GOP has become an autocratic party where no one dares to offend the autocrat. We saw the same thing this weekend with Speaker Mike Johnson.

On Sunday, George Stephanopoulos asked Johnson whether he can “unequivocally” say that Biden won the 2020 election and that Trump lost. The long-debunked election conspiracy is something that the former president continues to bring up at his campaign rallies, even a month before the 2024 election.

“See, this is the game that is always played by mainstream media with leading Republicans. It’s a gotcha game,” Johnson said on ABC’s “This Week.” “You want us to litigate things that happened four years ago when we’re talking about the future. We’re not gonna talk about what happened in 2020, we’re gonna talk about 2024 and how we’re gonna solve the problems for the American people.”

If Trump started saying that the sky is purple, it would become a “gotcha question” to ask other Republicans what color the sky is. They cannot contradict him, no matter how ridiculous his statements are. And this is what Trump wants for the country.

and the Helene aftermath

Most hurricanes’ worst damage comes from the high winds and storm surge near landfall, as when Katrina hit New Orleans. But Helene‘s most serious impacts have come from the heavy rains that it carried inland to places like Asheville, North Carolina, which sits in the Appalachian mountain range.

The confirmed death total from Helene in the US reached 227 Saturday, about half of them in North Carolina. Because they are inland and tucked into the mountains, many of the hardest-hit areas have been hard for relief workers and needed supplies to get to.

This situation has created opportunities for unscrupulous demagogues. Marjorie Taylor Greene, for example, has promoted the outrageous conspiracy theory that Helene was sent towards rural areas that the Biden/Harris administration doesn’t care about.

Yes they can control the weather. It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done.

The all-powerful “they”. There’s nothing “they” can’t do. Fortunately, that charge was too crazy to catch on, and MTG’s tweet mainly resulted in ridicule directed at her.

But Donald Trump’s lies, echoed by many other Republicans, have been just credible enough to cause harm. Most damaging has been the claim that FEMA has run out of money because it spent it all housing foreign migrants.

At a campaign rally in Michigan on Thursday, Trump claimed that “Kamala spent all her FEMA money, billions of dollars, on housing for illegal migrants, many of whom should not be in our country.” He added in an election-related conspiracy theory, saying, “They stole the FEMA money, just like they stole it from a bank, so they could give it to their illegal immigrants that they want to have vote for them this season.”

This statement packs a number of lies into a small package.

  • Noncitizens can’t vote, and there is no evidence that Harris or anyone else is trying to get them to.
  • Housing for migrants is a separate appropriation from disaster relief. FEMA manages both pots of money, but keeps them separate. Nothing has been stolen.
  • FEMA has not run out of money to respond to the disaster. If the $35 billion appropriated for disaster relief runs out, Congress can pass a supplemental appropriation, which it frequently does after major disasters. (If there is any delay in that process, it will be due to Speaker Johnson.)

Spreading this kind of disinformation has negative consequences for the very people Trump claims to be standing up for: If they think there’s no money, they may not apply for help they need.

And that’s just the tip of Trump’s iceberg of Helene-related lies. He has also falsely claimed

  • Democrats don’t want to help victims in Republican areas. (Republican governors and other local officials say otherwise.)
  • Federal help maxes out at $750. (In fact, $750 is what victims can get for immediate needs like groceries, and doesn’t affect their eligibility for further help.)
  • Federal helicopters aren’t rescuing people in North Carolina.

FEMA is now maintaining a website to combat misinformation and disinformation like the nonsense Trump is spouting.

This is all just stuff he makes up for his own political advantage. It’s further evidence of a major Harris-campaign theme: Trump doesn’t care about you. He only cares about himself.


Chris Hayes’ coverage of this issue is particularly good. Calling it “misinformation”, Hayes says, doesn’t do it justice.


Hurricane Milton is expected to be Category 3 when it hits Florida’s Gulf coast Wednesday.

and the campaign

I’m looking forward to watching Kamala Harris’ 60 Minutes interview tonight. Short clips are already available. Trump was offered a similar interview but chickened out turned it down.


At long last, the NYT raises the question of Trump’s age and whether he is all-there mentally.


Trump and Vance are claiming they don’t support a federal abortion “ban”, but that’s because they’ve started calling it something different: a “minimum national standard” on abortion.


Josh Marshall has been digging deep into the Trump get-out-the-vote (GOTV) operation, which might be trying out a novel theory or might just be failing.

GOTV is an important part of the inside-baseball of campaigning. Typically, GOTV isn’t about convincing people to vote for you — that’s already happened or not happened — it’s about making sure that the people who lean in your direction actually do vote. So you develop lists of people to call, looking for folks who don’t always vote, but have told past callers that they favor you. (Or maybe they just look like your voters demographically). Close to the election you contact those iffy voters, making sure they know where their polling place is, how they’re going to get there, and so on, offering help as needed.

By itself, GOTV isn’t going to produce a landslide, but a good vs. bad GOTV operation can make the difference in a close election. That’s why some Republicans have been expressing alarm about the apparent lack of a Trump GOTV push. Marshall has been trying to get to the bottom of these rumors.

What he’s finding is that Trump people had a decentralized GOTV concept intended to supplement the usual door-knocking and phone-banking. But more and more it looks like the decentralized plan is replacing their traditional GOTV, which is a big gamble. Partly that’s happening because the money for traditional GOTV instead went to pay Trump’s legal bills.

Susan Faludi writes in the NYT about how the “protection” theme works differently for male and female candidates. Trump can fear-monger and then tell women: “I will be your protector.” But a woman offering men protection runs into a deep resentment: “You cannot defend us without unmanning us.”

She also notes how protection comes in two flavors: protection from threats in the real world, and symbolically acting out the tropes of strength.

The symbolic is performative. Those who crave it don’t actually want effective measures to alleviate a threat. They wish to rage against the threat, and they seek a protector in chief who validates their wrath. For them, war’s the point, not victory — outrage, not outcomes

… Time and time again, nations that have sought protection under a fantasy führer — or a real one — have reaped the whirlwind. This fall, I’m voting my fears, too, but what I fear most is the whirlwind. I’m voting my need for protection, as well. I want a Constitution protected from the paper shredders. I want democratic process and the rule of law protected from rioters and scammers. I want reasoned and stable governance, exemplified by a president whose lodestar is the well-being and security of her citizenry, not the bloodlust of his base. I want, most of all, the fate of my nation to be protected against the judgment that history’s gods level against strongman societies.

The protection theme exemplifies the often misunderstood concept of structural privilege or structural discrimination. Male and female candidates can make the same promises, but the man will be cheered while the woman provokes dismay or anger. It’s not how she words or delivers the pledge, it’s the fact that she’s a woman.


Saturday, Elon Musk spoke (and danced wildly) at a Trump rally in Pennsylvania. I can only imagine the right-wing outrage if Mark Zuckerberg or any other social-media mogul appeared at a Harris rally.

This is a common pattern: Baseless right-wing accusations (like that social media favors Democrats) often lead to the Right blatantly doing that very thing. In the 2020 cycle, for example, Trump’s false charge that Biden had stolen the election justified his very real attempt to steal it through fraud and force.

and you also might be interested in …

Cory Doctorow uses Amazon Prime’s decision to start showing its customers even more ads to illustrate the general concept of “enshittification” (a term he coined in 2022).

Every ad that Amazon shows you shifts value away from you — your time, your attention — to the company’s shareholders.

That’s the crux of enshittification. Companies don’t enshittify — making their once-useful products monotonically worse — because it amuses them to erode the quality of their offerings. They enshittify them because their products are zero-sum: the things that make them valuable to you (watching videos without ads) make things less valuable to them (because they can’t monetize your attention).


Back in the summer, Oklahoma Superintendent of Schools Ryan Walters announced a new requirement that all public schools teach the Bible.

Effective immediately, all Oklahoma schools are required to incorporate the Bible, which includes the Ten Commandments, as an instructional support.

Now he’s asking the legislature for $3 million to buy 55,000 Bibles to put in Oklahoma’s classrooms. But issues of church-and-state aside, The Oklahoman found something fishy.

According to the bid documents, vendors must meet certain specifications: Bibles must be the King James Version; must contain the Old and New Testaments; must include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights; and must be bound in leather or leather-like material.

Almost no Bibles on the market meet all those criteria, but two do: The God Bless the U.S.A. Bible for $60 each, and the We the People Bible for $90. Both are endorsed by Donald Trump. A few months ago, BBC reported that Trump had made $300,000 from the first one.

Paying $60-$90 for a leather-bound Bible just isn’t necessary. The text of the Bible can be downloaded free online, and there are a variety of free Bible apps for your phone. If you insist on a physical copy, you’ll find a wide selection for less than $10. In any version, you can look at John 2:14-16 to see how Jesus felt about this kind of profiteering.

and let’s close with something that turns down the voltage

You don’t see a lot of cartoons based on electrical engineering concepts.