The two big stories of this week are difficult to reconcile: Democrats won handily in nearly all of Tuesday’s elections, and so Senate Democrats surrendered Sunday night in the shutdown battle.
One thing the 40-something-day shutdown did accomplish was to frame healthcare as the major difference between the parties. Democrats either want to keep patching up ObamaCare or push for a more complete national healthcare system, while Republicans want to junk ObamaCare in favor of some “cheaper, better” care system that somehow never quite comes together into a proposal that could be voted on and implemented.
This week’s featured post takes seriously Speaker Johnson’s claim the Republicans have “pages and pages” of healthcare ideas, which were contained in a 2019 report by the Republican Study Committee in the House. I read that report and I’ll be abstracting what I see as the underlying principles: (1) You can save money on healthcare if you gamble with people’s lives, and (2) that gamble is OK if you incentivize people to place the bets themselves.
In order to make sense of the RSC report’s proposals, I’ll have to summarize a lot of context, including the pre-ObamaCare problems and how ObamaCare tried to solve them. It’s going to be a long read, but I hope you’ll find in illuminating. That post should be out between 10 and 11 EST.
The weekly summary will of course cover the elections and the shutdown. I’ll also look at what’s been happening in Chicago, the Supreme Court’s discussion of Trump’s tariffs, and a few other things. It should be out before 1.